Total marketing share
2% to 10%
Published input · percent of revenue
General-law vendor guidance only. Not a survey of employment or immigration firms; includes internal marketing costs.
Population and limitsEmployment and immigration law: every source, range and assumption the calculator can use.
A complete reference, not a tool. Your numbers stay in the calculator.
Employment and immigration law
2% to 10%
Published input · percent of revenue
General-law vendor guidance only. Not a survey of employment or immigration firms; includes internal marketing costs.
Population and limits$1,750.00 to $3,500.00
Published input · USD per month
One vendor's live SEO/content menu; build fees and ad spend extra. Not a representative market survey.
Population and limitsSupplier menus are asking prices, not market averages or WorkHacker quotes. Podcast production and media are excluded unless the source says otherwise. A related citation does not turn a planning assumption into measured evidence.
Legal industry guideSee 21 business types on one scale. These are starting points for planning, not a ranking of performance. Browsing does not change your numbers.
Marketing share runs from zero to 20% on every bar. Solid bars show published inputs, dotted bars show published proxies, and diagonal bars show planning assumptions. Interval caps mark exact range endpoints. Different revenue bases and cost definitions are labeled below each business.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
Editable planning band around broad marketing surveys; no representative specialty-clinic survey. Total marketing includes staff, agency, production and media.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
Editable planning band around broad marketing surveys; no representative specialty-clinic survey. Total marketing includes staff, agency, production and media.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
Editable planning band around broad marketing surveys; no representative specialty-clinic survey. Total marketing includes staff, agency, production and media.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
Editable planning band around broad marketing surveys; no representative specialty-clinic survey. Total marketing includes staff, agency, production and media.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
Editable planning band around broad marketing surveys; no representative specialty-clinic survey. Total marketing includes staff, agency, production and media.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
Reported mean for healthcare respondents (n=17), Spring 2026, not a small specialty-practice survey or a required spend. Total marketing includes staff, media and agency/content costs. Canada physician offices report advertising/promotion 0.6% in 2024 [3], a narrower accounting line.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
ADA budgeting recommendation for an intermediate-stage practice, not observed average. Its new-practice recommendation is 3-6%, mature 2-3%. Canada reports advertising/promotion 1.4%, quality E, a narrower expenditure definition.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
AmSpa-hosted, Growth99-authored article attributes this average and a 2-15% range to AmSpa's 2024 report. Secondary exposition of trade-association survey, not independently audited data. Total marketing budget, not SEO-only spend; no equivalent Canadian cohort verified.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
Rounded scenario. Chiro survey mean advertising USD13,540 divided by mean collections USD450,425 = 3.01%, a ratio of means. Canada advertising ratios about 2.32% chiro and 1.79% therapist group, estimates quality E. No combined full-marketing-budget mean established.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
Growth scenario chosen above general legal guidance. PILMMA describes some injury firms exceeding 20-30%; neither publication establishes a representative PI spending distribution.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
Published general-law vendor guidance, not a criminal-defense survey. Includes website, personnel and advertising; revenue-goal budgeting differs from actual revenue.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
General-law vendor guidance only. Not a survey of employment or immigration firms; includes internal marketing costs.
Basis: home-sale revenue; sales commissions and overhead excluded. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously.
2024 NAHB sampled home-price breakdown marketing cost share. Sales commissions and overhead are separate. Not the share for every builder or a modular-only marketing budget; confirm all-channel scope.
Basis: commission and fee revenue, not transaction value. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously.
Budget scenario for a referral-led brokerage. CMO Survey broad real-estate mean 23.58% has only 7 responses and is not brokerage-specific. Use company commission revenue, not the value of homes sold.
Basis: net service revenue. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously.
Editable planning band allowing marketing staff and content plus some external support. Zweig's public release gives a USD 400,000 median annual marketing budget but no matching revenue denominator; no percentage can responsibly be derived. Seller-doer pursuit time and sales costs may be separate.
Basis: revenue; cash-budget planning allowance. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously.
Cash-budget planning allowance. Gartner's 7.8% is dominated by large enterprises and is not a broker benchmark; no comparable small-firm survey found.
Basis: revenue; cash marketing only, staff time excluded. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously.
Growth-seeking practices' cash marketing share; excludes staff time. Total economic marketing cost is 8.1%, not available agency cash.
Basis: commission and fee revenue, not transaction value. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously.
Vendor estimate used as a planning range, not survey evidence. Historical ACT figures use operating-budget share, not revenue.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
ConnectWise reports Service Leadership internal best-in-class marketing budget of 1.8% of revenue. Not the whole sales-and-marketing function, a population median, or a recommended growth target. Report also says 51% spend under USD 10,000 annually; revenue denominator not given.
Basis: annual recurring revenue (ARR), not collected revenue. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously.
2026 private B2B SaaS survey median marketing spend: 8% of ARR, also 8% for the selected USD 3 million to 5 million ARR cohort. Selling costs are separately reported. More than 1,000 responses; fieldwork completed March 2026.
Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below
Chosen marketing-only share below Promethean's 7% combined sales-and-marketing average, which includes salaries/media. The split is not published here; 5% is an editable allocation assumption.
The table has the same values, evidence and limitations as the chart. Revenue basis and included costs differ; percentages alone do not make these industries comparable.
| Business | Marketing share and evidence | Revenue basis, costs and limits | Sources and selection |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinics and health systems | |||
| Peptide and hormone clinics | 6% to 10% Planning assumption | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below Editable planning band around broad marketing surveys; no representative specialty-clinic survey. Total marketing includes staff, agency, production and media. | Use this business type |
| Medical weight loss and GLP-1 clinics | 6% to 10% Planning assumption | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below Editable planning band around broad marketing surveys; no representative specialty-clinic survey. Total marketing includes staff, agency, production and media. | Use this business type |
| Regenerative medicine and stem cell clinics | 6% to 10% Planning assumption | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below Editable planning band around broad marketing surveys; no representative specialty-clinic survey. Total marketing includes staff, agency, production and media. | Use this business type |
| Behavioral health and addiction treatment centers | 6% to 10% Planning assumption | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below Editable planning band around broad marketing surveys; no representative specialty-clinic survey. Total marketing includes staff, agency, production and media. | Use this business type |
| Longevity or IV therapy clinics | 6% to 10% Planning assumption | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below Editable planning band around broad marketing surveys; no representative specialty-clinic survey. Total marketing includes staff, agency, production and media. | Use this business type |
| Specialty medical practices | 5.88% Published proxy | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below Reported mean for healthcare respondents (n=17), Spring 2026, not a small specialty-practice survey or a required spend. Total marketing includes staff, media and agency/content costs. Canada physician offices report advertising/promotion 0.6% in 2024 [3], a narrower accounting line. | Use this business type |
| Dental practices | 4% Published input | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below ADA budgeting recommendation for an intermediate-stage practice, not observed average. Its new-practice recommendation is 3-6%, mature 2-3%. Canada reports advertising/promotion 1.4%, quality E, a narrower expenditure definition. | Use this business type |
| Med spa and aesthetics | 7% Published input | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below AmSpa-hosted, Growth99-authored article attributes this average and a 2-15% range to AmSpa's 2024 report. Secondary exposition of trade-association survey, not independently audited data. Total marketing budget, not SEO-only spend; no equivalent Canadian cohort verified. | Use this business type |
| Physical therapy and chiropractic | 3% Planning assumption | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below Rounded scenario. Chiro survey mean advertising USD13,540 divided by mean collections USD450,425 = 3.01%, a ratio of means. Canada advertising ratios about 2.32% chiro and 1.79% therapist group, estimates quality E. No combined full-marketing-budget mean established. | Use this business type |
| Legal | |||
| Personal injury law | 10% to 20% Planning assumption | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below Growth scenario chosen above general legal guidance. PILMMA describes some injury firms exceeding 20-30%; neither publication establishes a representative PI spending distribution. | Use this business type |
| Criminal defense | 2% to 10% Published proxy | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below Published general-law vendor guidance, not a criminal-defense survey. Includes website, personnel and advertising; revenue-goal budgeting differs from actual revenue. | Use this business type |
| Employment and immigration lawYour business | 2% to 10% Published proxy | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below General-law vendor guidance only. Not a survey of employment or immigration firms; includes internal marketing costs. | Use this business type |
| Construction | |||
| Home builders and modular homes | 0.8% Published input | Basis: home-sale revenue; sales commissions and overhead excluded. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously. 2024 NAHB sampled home-price breakdown marketing cost share. Sales commissions and overhead are separate. Not the share for every builder or a modular-only marketing budget; confirm all-channel scope. | Use this business type |
| Real estate brokerages | 3% to 5% Planning assumption | Basis: commission and fee revenue, not transaction value. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously. Budget scenario for a referral-led brokerage. CMO Survey broad real-estate mean 23.58% has only 7 responses and is not brokerage-specific. Use company commission revenue, not the value of homes sold. | Use this business type |
| Civil engineering and AEC firms | 3% to 6% Planning assumption | Basis: net service revenue. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously. Editable planning band allowing marketing staff and content plus some external support. Zweig's public release gives a USD 400,000 median annual marketing budget but no matching revenue denominator; no percentage can responsibly be derived. Seller-doer pursuit time and sales costs may be separate. | Use this business type |
| Wealth and financial advice | |||
| M&A advisors and business brokers | 5% Planning assumption | Basis: revenue; cash-budget planning allowance. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously. Cash-budget planning allowance. Gartner's 7.8% is dominated by large enterprises and is not a broker benchmark; no comparable small-firm survey found. | Use this business type |
| Wealth management and RIAs | 2.6% Published input | Basis: revenue; cash marketing only, staff time excluded. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously. Growth-seeking practices' cash marketing share; excludes staff time. Total economic marketing cost is 8.1%, not available agency cash. | Use this business type |
| Independent insurance agencies | 2% to 5% Planning assumption | Basis: commission and fee revenue, not transaction value. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously. Vendor estimate used as a planning range, not survey evidence. Historical ACT figures use operating-budget share, not revenue. | Use this business type |
| B2B | |||
| IT providers and MSPs for midsize companies | 1.8% Published input | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below ConnectWise reports Service Leadership internal best-in-class marketing budget of 1.8% of revenue. Not the whole sales-and-marketing function, a population median, or a recommended growth target. Report also says 51% spend under USD 10,000 annually; revenue denominator not given. | Use this business type |
| B2B SaaS | 8% Published input | Basis: annual recurring revenue (ARR), not collected revenue. Different accounting basis. Compare cautiously. 2026 private B2B SaaS survey median marketing spend: 8% of ARR, also 8% for the selected USD 3 million to 5 million ARR cohort. Selling costs are separately reported. More than 1,000 responses; fieldwork completed March 2026. | Use this business type |
| Marketing and web agencies | 5% Planning assumption | Basis: company revenue; cost coverage follows the source below Chosen marketing-only share below Promethean's 7% combined sales-and-marketing average, which includes salaries/media. The split is not published here; 5% is an editable allocation assumption. | Use this business type |
207 sources, organized by business type. Shared evidence is listed once, with links to every use. Published inputs, supplier prices and planning assumptions keep their original context.
Gartner
Published 25 June 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 6% to 10% · percent of revenue · Planning assumption
Peptide and hormone clinics: population and denominatorEditable planning band around broad marketing surveys; no representative specialty-clinic survey. Total marketing includes staff, agency, production and media.
Used for:
Peptide and hormone clinicsMedical weight loss and GLP-1 clinicsRegenerative medicine and stem cell clinicsBehavioral health and addiction treatment centersLongevity or IV therapy clinicsDuke Fuqua / Deloitte / American Marketing Association
Published 2025; exact release date not stated in PDF; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 6% to 10% · percent of revenue · Planning assumption
Peptide and hormone clinics: population and denominatorEditable planning band around broad marketing surveys; no representative specialty-clinic survey. Total marketing includes staff, agency, production and media.
Used for:
Peptide and hormone clinicsMedical weight loss and GLP-1 clinicsRegenerative medicine and stem cell clinicsBehavioral health and addiction treatment centersLongevity or IV therapy clinicsHone Health
Published 29 September 2026 (updated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $15,000.00 to $75,000.00 · USD per month · Planning assumption
Peptide and hormone clinics: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $180.00 to $220.00 · USD initial service engagement · Published proxy
Peptide and hormone clinics: population and denominatorPayments per year: 12 · billing periods per active year · Planning assumption
Peptide and hormone clinics: population and denominatorRelationship horizon: 0.5 to 1 · years · Planning assumption
Peptide and hormone clinics: population and denominatorRepeat payment: $135.00 to $155.00 · USD per repeat service month · Published proxy
Peptide and hormone clinics: population and denominatorScenario: 100-500 active patients at an assumed $150 monthly retained service fee. Patient counts and fee mix are assumptions, not a typical-size survey. Exclude pharmacy sales not retained by clinic.
Used for:
Peptide and hormone clinicsWebFX
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $1,500.00 to $5,000.00 · USD per month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Peptide and hormone clinics: population and denominatorPublished general-healthcare supplier estimate; not specialty invoices. Excludes media and podcast production.
Used for:
Peptide and hormone clinicsMedical weight loss and GLP-1 clinicsRegenerative medicine and stem cell clinicsBehavioral health and addiction treatment centersLongevity or IV therapy clinicsUS Food and Drug Administration
Publication date unknown live list; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Review each peptide's current FDA status; withdrawn nominations are not approval. Peptide additions require molecule-specific review, including current certification restrictions.
Back to calculatorFederal Trade Commission
Published 20 December 2022; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Substantiate clinical claims in every promotional format, including podcasts. Red flags include unclear care level, incentivized referrals and unsupported recovery guarantees.
Used for:
Peptide and hormone clinicsMedical weight loss and GLP-1 clinicsRegenerative medicine and stem cell clinicsBehavioral health and addiction treatment centersLongevity or IV therapy clinicsGoogle Ads
Publication date unknown live policy; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Prescription telemedicine needs category-specific Google/LegitScript checks; Meta access was blocked. Check prescription-service Google/LegitScript eligibility; Meta text was blocked. Google restricts speculative/cell promotions, with approved-product and educational exceptions. Covered addiction ads require Google/LegitScript certification; Meta text was blocked. Ordinary psychotherapy is not automatically covered by addiction-ad certification. Prescription longevity ads need Google/LegitScript scope checks; Meta text was blocked.
Used for:
Peptide and hormone clinicsMedical weight loss and GLP-1 clinicsRegenerative medicine and stem cell clinicsBehavioral health and addiction treatment centersLongevity or IV therapy clinicsGoogle Ads
Publication date unknown live policy; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Sensitive health targeting needs Google audience-policy review.
Used for:
Peptide and hormone clinicsMedical weight loss and GLP-1 clinicsRegenerative medicine and stem cell clinicsBehavioral health and addiction treatment centersLongevity or IV therapy clinicsMeta Transparency Center
Publication date unknown; current text not retrieved; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Prescription telemedicine needs category-specific Google/LegitScript checks; Meta access was blocked. Check prescription-service Google/LegitScript eligibility; Meta text was blocked. Current Meta healthcare creative policy could not be retrieved; certification alone is not approval. Prescription longevity ads need Google/LegitScript scope checks; Meta text was blocked.
Used for:
Peptide and hormone clinicsMedical weight loss and GLP-1 clinicsRegenerative medicine and stem cell clinicsLongevity or IV therapy clinicsLegitScript
Publication date unknown live program page; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Prescription telemedicine needs category-specific Google/LegitScript checks; Meta access was blocked. Check prescription-service Google/LegitScript eligibility; Meta text was blocked. Current Meta healthcare creative policy could not be retrieved; certification alone is not approval. Prescription longevity ads need Google/LegitScript scope checks; Meta text was blocked.
Used for:
Peptide and hormone clinicsMedical weight loss and GLP-1 clinicsRegenerative medicine and stem cell clinicsLongevity or IV therapy clinicsLegitScript
Published 22 September 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
LegitScript says advisory peptide votes do not authorize promotion or compounding. Peptide additions require molecule-specific review, including current certification restrictions.
Back to calculatorTexas Medical Board
Published February 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
State-specific example: Texas delegated-care advertising identifies the supervising physician. Texas delegated-care rules include IV hydration and supervising-physician advertising identification.
Back to calculatorMedical Board of California
Publication date unknown live page; references January 2007 newsletter; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Red flags include hidden clinicians, paper-only supervision and unsupported results. State-specific example: California board guidance expects real supervision and disclosed risks. California board guidance flags unrealistic promises, hidden supervision and missing complication support.
Used for:
Peptide and hormone clinicsRegenerative medicine and stem cell clinicsLongevity or IV therapy clinicsCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Publication date unknown live guidance; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Check self-pay estimate duties and clearly explain excluded charges.
Used for:
Peptide and hormone clinicsMedical weight loss and GLP-1 clinicsRegenerative medicine and stem cell clinicsBehavioral health and addiction treatment centersLongevity or IV therapy clinicsLegitScript
Published 15 September 2026 (version); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Prescription telemedicine needs category-specific Google/LegitScript checks; Meta access was blocked. State-specific care, licensing and jurisdiction checks apply to telemedicine and partners.
Back to calculatorRo
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $15,000.00 to $75,000.00 · USD per month · Planning assumption
Medical weight loss and GLP-1 clinics: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $39.00 · USD first membership month · Published input
Medical weight loss and GLP-1 clinics: population and denominatorPayments per year: 12 · billing periods per active year · Planning assumption
Medical weight loss and GLP-1 clinics: population and denominatorRepeat payment: $149.00 · USD per repeat membership month · Published input
Medical weight loss and GLP-1 clinics: population and denominatorScenario: 100-500 active patients at an assumed $150 retained care fee. Counts are assumed. Exclude patient payments to pharmacies; bundled drug revenue needs its own direct-cost accounting.
Back to calculatorJAMA Network Open / American Medical Association
Published 31 January 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Relationship horizon: 0.25 to 0.75 · years · Planning assumption
Medical weight loss and GLP-1 clinics: population and denominatorAssumed 3-9 retained paid months. Published medication discontinuation supports caution about long LTV, but does not establish this clinic-retention range.
Back to calculatorUS Food and Drug Administration
Published 1 April 2026 (latest dated entry); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
503A/503B and copy restrictions require current review; added B12 is not automatic permission.
Back to calculatorUS Food and Drug Administration
Publication date unknown live page; includes data through 2026-05-31; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: publication date unknown live page; includes data through 2026-05-31.
Context only; no numeric input.
FDA red flags include absent screening, clinician access or trustworthy pharmacy sourcing.
Back to calculatorUS Food and Drug Administration
Publication date unknown live guidance; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Compounded GLP-1 promotion must avoid equivalence, generic and misleading compounder or FDA-approval claims.
Back to calculatorMeta Transparency Center
Publication date unknown; current text not retrieved; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Check prescription-service Google/LegitScript eligibility; Meta text was blocked. Current Meta healthcare creative policy could not be retrieved; certification alone is not approval. Prescription longevity ads need Google/LegitScript scope checks; Meta text was blocked.
Used for:
Medical weight loss and GLP-1 clinicsRegenerative medicine and stem cell clinicsLongevity or IV therapy clinicsUS Food and Drug Administration
Published 3 March 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Marketing enforcement is current: FDA issued 30 telehealth warning letters in March 2026.
Back to calculatorRegenexx
Published June 2019 (archive path; exact document date not verified); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $30,000.00 to $120,000.00 · USD per month · Planning assumption
Regenerative medicine and stem cell clinics: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $3,000.00 · USD per treatment episode · Planning assumption
Regenerative medicine and stem cell clinics: population and denominatorScenario: 10-40 lawful treatment episodes per month at an assumed $3,000 realized fee. No public representative revenue distribution found. Does not model or validate unapproved therapies.
Back to calculatorUS Food and Drug Administration
Published 3 June 2021; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
FDA registration or trial listing does not establish lawful marketing; verify product-specific approval and indication. Do not reuse the 2021 statement that only cord-blood stem-cell products are approved. Red flags: broad cure claims, missing product provenance and pressure to buy unsupported treatment.
Back to calculatorUS Food and Drug Administration
Publication date unknown live product list; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
FDA registration or trial listing does not establish lawful marketing; verify product-specific approval and indication. Do not reuse the 2021 statement that only cord-blood stem-cell products are approved.
Back to calculatorFirst Page Sage
Published 8 October 2026 (updated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Organic versus paid enquiry cost: 0.6041666667 · organic CPL divided by paid CPL · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Behavioral health and addiction treatment centers: population and denominatorDerived vendor addiction-treatment ratio: $232/$384. Not independently validated; not ordinary psychotherapy or SEO-only. Use comparison context, not guaranteed savings or an automatic CAC reduction.
Back to calculatorMeta Transparency Center
Publication date unknown; current text not retrieved; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Covered addiction ads require Google/LegitScript certification; Meta text was blocked.
Back to calculatorLegitScript
Publication date unknown live program page; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Covered addiction ads require Google/LegitScript certification; Meta text was blocked. Ordinary psychotherapy is not automatically covered by addiction-ad certification.
Back to calculatorUS Department of Health and Human Services
Publication date unknown live overview; final rule 2024; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Covered Part 2 programs need patient-record confidentiality review, including stories and attribution.
Back to calculatorFlorida Legislature
Published 2026 statutory compilation; last amendment history shown 2020; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Florida prohibits patient-referral kickbacks subject to exceptions; review per-admission marketing fees. Red flags include unclear care level, incentivized referrals and unsupported recovery guarantees.
Back to calculatorSilver Hill Hospital
Published 17 March 2025 (revised); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $250,000.00 to $1,000,000.00 · USD per month · Planning assumption
Behavioral health and addiction treatment centers: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $59,136.00 to $87,360.00 · USD per 28 day residential episode · Published input
Behavioral health and addiction treatment centers: population and denominatorResidential scenario: 4-12 paid 28-day episodes monthly at a single provider's 2025 example fees, with rounded revenue endpoints. Admission volume and fee mix are assumed, not a typical-center survey. Outpatient clinics must use collected visit revenue and capacity.
Back to calculatorThe Cure IV
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $15,000.00 to $60,000.00 · USD per month · Planning assumption
Longevity or IV therapy clinics: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $299.00 · USD first basic IV membership month · Published input
Longevity or IV therapy clinics: population and denominatorPayments per year: 12 · billing periods per active year · Planning assumption
Longevity or IV therapy clinics: population and denominatorRepeat payment: $299.00 · USD first basic IV membership month · Planning assumption
Longevity or IV therapy clinics: population and denominatorIV-led scenario: 50-200 paying members at assumed $300 realized monthly revenue, rounded from one provider's $299 plan. Counts assumed. Not comprehensive longevity-program revenue; replace for annual diagnostics packages.
Used for:
Longevity or IV therapy clinicsFederal Trade Commission
Published September 2018 (exact day not verified); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
IV disease and longevity benefit claims need evidence; FTC has enforced against unsupported IV claims.
Used for:
Longevity or IV therapy clinicsPELORA
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorAmerican Med Spa Association
Published 10 June 2024; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorAmerican Med Spa Association
Published 15 January 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorDefy Medical
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorEli Lilly and Company
Published 16 March 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorThriveworks
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorLocaliQ
Published 29 July 2025 (page updated); data 1 May 2020 to 25 June 2021; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: 29 July 2025 (page updated); data 1 May 2020 to 25 June 2021.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorAhrefs
Published 15 August 2024 (updated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorEndocrine Society
Publication date unknown live series page; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorObesity Medicine Association
Published ongoing; episode dated 18 September 2026 visible; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorHazelden Betty Ford Foundation
Publication date unknown live series page; some displayed episodes 2023; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorHazelden Betty Ford Foundation
Published 2023 reporting year; publication date not stated; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: 2023 reporting year; publication date not stated.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorRuscio Institute / provider publisher
Published ongoing; episode dated 27 September 2026 visible; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorKFF
Published 14 November 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorThe CMO Survey (Duke University, Deloitte, AMA)
Published March 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 5.88% · percent of revenue · Published input
Specialty medical practices: population and denominatorReported mean for healthcare respondents (n=17), Spring 2026, not a small specialty-practice survey or a required spend. Total marketing includes staff, media and agency/content costs. Canada physician offices report advertising/promotion 0.6% in 2024 [3], a narrower accounting line.
Used for:
Specialty medical practicesISED / Statistics Canada
Publication date unknown (2024 data; 2019-03-01 template date is not data publication); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: publication date unknown (2024 data; 2019-03-01 template date is not data publication).
Monthly retained revenue: $40,000.00 to $200,000.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption
Specialty medical practices: population and denominatorGross contribution margin: 30% to 50% · percent of collected revenue · Planning assumption
Specialty medical practices: population and denominatorIllustrative collected-revenue band for one to several outpatient clinicians, not an observed US distribution. Canada: 2024 physician-office SME revenue middle two quartiles CAD212,000-622,000/year, or CAD17,667-51,833/month; mean CAD489,400/year. Includes generalists; no currency conversion or US extrapolation.
Used for:
Specialty medical practicesInvoca (vendor study)
Published July 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Enquiry to attended meeting: 45% · percent of qualified enquiries booked · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Specialty medical practices: population and denominatorEnquiry to attended meeting: 53% · percent of qualified phone leads booked · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Dental practices: population and denominatorAdjacent Invoca 2026 healthcare benchmark: 45% of qualified phone leads convert on-call to an appointment. Specialty clinics are not a separately reported segment; applying it to all enquiries is an assumption. Booked appointment is not attendance.
Source stage does not establish this attended-meeting denominator. Enter your actual matching stage; original research is retained below.
This measure is incompatible with the calculation and is not loaded as an input.
Back to calculatorDermatology Partners PLLC (single US practice)
Published 2026 (rates effective; publication date unknown); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
First customer payment: $250.00 · USD/attended visit · Planning assumption
Specialty medical practices: population and denominatorIllustrative initial collected visit revenue. One dermatology practice lists new-patient self-pay fees USD160-485 by complexity, including USD245 for 99203. Not an average across specialties, insurers or Canada. Use total collected payer plus patient receipts, not patient copay alone; procedures require their own preset.
Used for:
Specialty medical practicesFirst Page Sage (agency study)
Published 8 October 2026 (updated; January 2022-August 2026 observations); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Organic versus paid enquiry cost: 0.9587 · organic CPL / paid CPL ratio · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Specialty medical practices: population and denominatorAdjacent healthcare agency study reports organic USD348 versus paid USD363 per lead; 348/363=0.9587. Applying that broad, undisclosed-size sample to specialty patient enquiries is an assumption. Costs must include content, agency fees and internal labour, with identical lead qualification and attribution windows.
Used for:
Specialty medical practicesPatientGain (marketing software vendor guide)
Publication date unknown (page discusses 2026 pricing); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $1,500.00 to $5,000.00 · USD/month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Specialty medical practices: population and denominatorVendor guide reports this standard medical-practice SEO retainer range; specialized growth plans separately USD2,500-7,500. Publication date and pricing survey methodology are absent. Reported vendor estimate, not proof of actual bills or a Workhacker quote; media and setup can be additional.
Used for:
Specialty medical practicesUS HHS Office for Civil Rights
Published 3 April 2003 (revised); 26 July 2013 (reviewed); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
US HIPAA-covered practices: review PHI use in testimonials, case stories and marketing, obtain required authorization, and check exceptions rather than assuming all communications need authorization. Tracking review must reflect HHS's court notice: IP plus a visit to an unauthenticated health page alone is not automatically PHI under the vacated portion. HIPAA-covered US practices must review patient stories, marketing authorization and tracking disclosures. Canadian practices need applicable federal/provincial privacy controls, including appropriate consent for sensitive information. Include these checks in content and audio production. HIPAA applies to covered US entities and PHI disclosures; cookie consent alone is not marketing authorization. Apply relevant Canadian privacy requirements to sensitive health information. Review case stories, voice testimonials, pixels and episode promotion. Review US PHI disclosure/authorization and applicable Canadian sensitive-information consent before stories, recordings or tracking. Google health-personalization restrictions also affect paid campaigns for symptoms and conditions.
Used for:
Specialty medical practicesDental practicesMed spa and aestheticsPhysical therapy and chiropracticUS HHS Office for Civil Rights
Published 18 March 2024 (revision); current page also carries 20 June 2024 court notice; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
US HIPAA-covered practices: review PHI use in testimonials, case stories and marketing, obtain required authorization, and check exceptions rather than assuming all communications need authorization. Tracking review must reflect HHS's court notice: IP plus a visit to an unauthenticated health page alone is not automatically PHI under the vacated portion. HIPAA-covered US practices must review patient stories, marketing authorization and tracking disclosures. Canadian practices need applicable federal/provincial privacy controls, including appropriate consent for sensitive information. Include these checks in content and audio production. HIPAA applies to covered US entities and PHI disclosures; cookie consent alone is not marketing authorization. Apply relevant Canadian privacy requirements to sensitive health information. Review case stories, voice testimonials, pixels and episode promotion. Review US PHI disclosure/authorization and applicable Canadian sensitive-information consent before stories, recordings or tracking. Google health-personalization restrictions also affect paid campaigns for symptoms and conditions.
Used for:
Specialty medical practicesDental practicesMed spa and aestheticsPhysical therapy and chiropracticCollege of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario
Published December 2020 (Council approval); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Ontario physician advertising includes third-party unpaid web content. Claims must be verifiable and evidence-supported; testimonials, comparisons and superiority claims are prohibited. Before/after imagery has specific consent, presentation and distribution limits. These Ontario rules are not a Canada-wide blanket ban. Canada restricts consumer prescription-drug advertising. Health Canada specifically flags promotional Botox benefit claims, including some before/after imagery, procedure videos and testimonials. Ontario physician advertising also prohibits testimonials and has detailed imagery consent and placement conditions.
Back to calculatorJustice Laws Website, Government of Canada
Publication date unknown (live consolidated regulation); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Canada prescription-drug consumer advertising is restricted by C.01.044 to names, price and quantity. Check named-drug content separately from general service education; apply provincial privacy law and appropriate express consent for sensitive health information. Canada restricts consumer prescription-drug advertising. Health Canada specifically flags promotional Botox benefit claims, including some before/after imagery, procedure videos and testimonials. Ontario physician advertising also prohibits testimonials and has detailed imagery consent and placement conditions.
Back to calculatorGoogle Ads
Publication date unknown (live policy); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Google restricts prescription terms/services, experimental treatments and some specialty services. Health-related personalized audiences face separate restrictions. Check treatment, location, destination and certification before allocating paid media. Google health-personalization restrictions and healthcare advertising policies can affect condition- or procedure-specific campaigns. Review paid destinations separately from educational articles. Health product claims require substantiation. Google treats health personalization separately from treatment/drug advertising eligibility. Build evidence review into scripts, articles, show notes, captions and ad destinations.
Back to calculatorGoogle Ads
Publication date unknown (live policy); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Google restricts prescription terms/services, experimental treatments and some specialty services. Health-related personalized audiences face separate restrictions. Check treatment, location, destination and certification before allocating paid media. Google health-personalization restrictions and healthcare advertising policies can affect condition- or procedure-specific campaigns. Review paid destinations separately from educational articles. Health product claims require substantiation. Google treats health personalization separately from treatment/drug advertising eligibility. Build evidence review into scripts, articles, show notes, captions and ad destinations. Review US PHI disclosure/authorization and applicable Canadian sensitive-information consent before stories, recordings or tracking. Google health-personalization restrictions also affect paid campaigns for symptoms and conditions.
Used for:
Specialty medical practicesDental practicesMed spa and aestheticsPhysical therapy and chiropracticUS Federal Trade Commission
Published December 2022; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
For health products featured by a clinic, FTC guidance requires truthful claims and suitable scientific substantiation. Reserve clinician review for scripts, articles, show notes and promotional snippets. This is an operational recommendation, not a sourced number of review hours. Health product claims require substantiation. Google treats health personalization separately from treatment/drug advertising eligibility. Build evidence review into scripts, articles, show notes, captions and ad destinations.
Back to calculatorOffice of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Published May 2018 (guideline issued; current web revision unknown); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Canada prescription-drug consumer advertising is restricted by C.01.044 to names, price and quantity. Check named-drug content separately from general service education; apply provincial privacy law and appropriate express consent for sensitive health information. HIPAA-covered US practices must review patient stories, marketing authorization and tracking disclosures. Canadian practices need applicable federal/provincial privacy controls, including appropriate consent for sensitive information. Include these checks in content and audio production. HIPAA applies to covered US entities and PHI disclosures; cookie consent alone is not marketing authorization. Apply relevant Canadian privacy requirements to sensitive health information. Review case stories, voice testimonials, pixels and episode promotion. Review US PHI disclosure/authorization and applicable Canadian sensitive-information consent before stories, recordings or tracking. Google health-personalization restrictions also affect paid campaigns for symptoms and conditions.
Used for:
Specialty medical practicesDental practicesMed spa and aestheticsPhysical therapy and chiropracticAmerican Dental Association Health Policy Institute
Publication date unknown (2025 survey data); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: publication date unknown (2025 survey data).
Monthly retained revenue: $50,000.00 to $150,000.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption
Dental practices: population and denominatorIllustrative collected-revenue chip for a small general practice, not a measured range. ADA 2025 mean gross billings: USD965,660/dentist/year (USD80,472/month). Canada SME dental-office mean: CAD799,000/year (CAD66,583/month); upper-middle revenue quartile CAD397,000-1,161,000/year. Billings per dentist and revenue per business differ.
Used for:
Dental practicesAmerican Dental Association
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 4% · percent of revenue · Published input
Dental practices: population and denominatorGross contribution margin: 45% to 60% · percent of collected revenue · Planning assumption
Dental practices: population and denominatorADA budgeting recommendation for an intermediate-stage practice, not observed average. Its new-practice recommendation is 3-6%, mature 2-3%. Canada reports advertising/promotion 1.4%, quality E, a narrower expenditure definition.
Used for:
Dental practicesISED / Statistics Canada
Publication date unknown (2024 data; static footer is not release date); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: publication date unknown (2024 data; static footer is not release date).
Monthly retained revenue: $50,000.00 to $150,000.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption
Dental practices: population and denominatorIllustrative collected-revenue chip for a small general practice, not a measured range. ADA 2025 mean gross billings: USD965,660/dentist/year (USD80,472/month). Canada SME dental-office mean: CAD799,000/year (CAD66,583/month); upper-middle revenue quartile CAD397,000-1,161,000/year. Billings per dentist and revenue per business differ.
Used for:
Dental practicesISED / Statistics Canada
Publication date unknown (2024 data; static footer is not release date); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: publication date unknown (2024 data; static footer is not release date).
Total marketing share: 4% · percent of revenue · Published input
Dental practices: population and denominatorGross contribution margin: 45% to 60% · percent of collected revenue · Planning assumption
Dental practices: population and denominatorADA budgeting recommendation for an intermediate-stage practice, not observed average. Its new-practice recommendation is 3-6%, mature 2-3%. Canada reports advertising/promotion 1.4%, quality E, a narrower expenditure definition.
Used for:
Dental practicesPrecision Dental Group (single New Jersey practice)
Publication date unknown (live offer); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
First customer payment: $250.00 · USD/attended first visit · Planning assumption
Dental practices: population and denominatorIllustrative routine first visit assuming full collection. One New Jersey practice offers USD250 exam/X-rays/cleaning/scan, regular USD535. Promotional fee is not national average collections. Orthodontic, implant and cosmetic case values need separate inputs.
Used for:
Dental practicesCanadian Dental Association
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Payments per year: 2 · attended visits/customer/year · Planning assumption
Dental practices: population and denominatorTwo preventive visits per year is a care scenario; CDA describes six-month exams for many patients but individualized intervals. Guidance is not observed purchases and does not mean all patients buy twice annually.
Used for:
Dental practicesPlanet DDS (software vendor study)
Published February 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Meeting to customer: 50% · percent of attended consults accepting paid treatment · Planning assumption
Dental practices: population and denominatorIllustrative treatment acceptance. Planet DDS reports 58% case acceptance in 2025 Denticon data across more than 5,200 practices. Treatment plans are not new consults; applying that measure to this stage is not a sourced conversion benchmark. For paid first-visit acquisition omit a second close stage.
Used for:
Dental practicesCallRail (vendor survey commentary)
Published 28 April 2026 (updated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Organic enquiry share: 50% · percent of qualified new enquiries · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Dental practices: population and denominatorNeutral half-organic channel-mix scenario to replace with practice attribution. CallRail's 71% describes practices ranking SEO their top channel, not 71% of new patients or enquiries.
Used for:
Dental practicesLifted Websites (agency offer)
Published 13 July 2026 (updated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $800.00 to $2,000.00 · USD/month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Dental practices: population and denominatorPublished Lifted Websites offers for local and multi-location dental SEO; custom work starts higher. US-dollar interpretation follows its Arizona/US offering; page uses dollar signs. Not observed client spending. Canada vendor lists CAD1,200 single-clinic and CAD2,000 growing-practice plans.
Used for:
Dental practicesSEO Web Marketing Canada (agency offer)
Publication date unknown (live offer); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $800.00 to $2,000.00 · USD/month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Dental practices: population and denominatorPublished Lifted Websites offers for local and multi-location dental SEO; custom work starts higher. US-dollar interpretation follows its Arizona/US offering; page uses dollar signs. Not observed client spending. Canada vendor lists CAD1,200 single-clinic and CAD2,000 growing-practice plans.
Used for:
Dental practicesRoyal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario
Published November 2012 (advisory); September 2024 (footer); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Ontario dental rules add restrictions on testimonials, superiority, incentives/free services and fee-splitting. Procedure advertising needs appropriate general-practitioner or specialist disclosure. Ontario restrictions are not uniform national Canadian rules.
Used for:
Dental practicesAmerican Dental Association
Published 2023 edition; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
US dental advertising: ADA ethics prohibits materially misleading promotions and restricts referral fees. Relevant state licensing and advertising law still applies; review specialist titles, fee claims and testimonial wording for the jurisdiction.
Used for:
Dental practicesAmerican Med Spa Association
Published 6 November 2024 (2023 observations); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $60,000.00 to $150,000.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption
Med spa and aesthetics: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $400.00 · USD/attended first treatment · Planning assumption
Med spa and aesthetics: population and denominatorRelationship horizon: 2 · years · Planning assumption
Med spa and aesthetics: population and denominatorIllustrative small/midsize location chip, not sourced percentile boundaries. AmSpa 2024 report recap: mean USD1,398,833/year = USD116,569/month, based on older 2023 observations. Zenoti's 2025 platform median location revenue is $1.86m/year, but North America currency normalization is not established. No Canada-only operating cohort found.
Used for:
Med spa and aestheticsAmerican Med Spa Association / Growth99 (vendor-authored commentary)
Published 2 May 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 7% · percent of revenue · Published input
Med spa and aesthetics: population and denominatorAmSpa-hosted, Growth99-authored article attributes this average and a 2-15% range to AmSpa's 2024 report. Secondary exposition of trade-association survey, not independently audited data. Total marketing budget, not SEO-only spend; no equivalent Canadian cohort verified.
Used for:
Med spa and aestheticsZenoti (software vendor study)
Published 29 April 2026 (2025 observations); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $60,000.00 to $150,000.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption
Med spa and aesthetics: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $400.00 · USD/attended first treatment · Planning assumption
Med spa and aesthetics: population and denominatorIllustrative small/midsize location chip, not sourced percentile boundaries. AmSpa 2024 report recap: mean USD1,398,833/year = USD116,569/month, based on older 2023 observations. Zenoti's 2025 platform median location revenue is $1.86m/year, but North America currency normalization is not established. No Canada-only operating cohort found.
Used for:
Med spa and aestheticsZenoti (vendor advice, not observed margin survey)
Published 22 July 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Payments per year: 2 · attended treatments/customer/year · Planning assumption
Med spa and aesthetics: population and denominatorGross contribution margin: 60% · percent of collected treatment revenue · Planning assumption
Med spa and aesthetics: population and denominatorConservative mixed-service scenario. Vendor advice distinguishes occasional visitors and frequent members, without representative purchase-frequency methodology. Treatment schedule is not proof of actual return purchases; do not prescribe clinical frequency from this calculator.
Used for:
Med spa and aestheticsPractice Growth Co (agency portfolio study)
Published 22 July 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Enquiry to attended meeting: 30% to 40% · percent of leads booking a consult · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Med spa and aesthetics: population and denominatorMeeting to customer: 50% to 60% · percent of consults becoming paying patients · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Med spa and aesthetics: population and denominatorReported directional range from one agency's medspa portfolio, not representative US/Canada industry mean. Cohort size and observation period are undisclosed. Booked consultation is not attendance.
Source stage does not establish this attended-meeting denominator. Enter your actual matching stage; original research is retained below.
This measure is incompatible with the calculation and is not loaded as an input.
Used for:
Med spa and aestheticsLifted Websites (agency offer)
Published July 2026 (updated; exact day unknown); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $800.00 to $2,000.00 · USD/month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Med spa and aesthetics: population and denominatorLifted Websites published single-location and up-to-three-location offers; custom scope is higher. Dollar denomination inferred from Arizona/US offering, not explicit USD label. Prices are offers, not national actual spending. Canadian medspa-inclusive medical SEO offer starts CAD750/month.
Used for:
Med spa and aestheticsLeonyx AI (agency offer)
Publication date unknown (live offer); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $800.00 to $2,000.00 · USD/month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Med spa and aesthetics: population and denominatorLifted Websites published single-location and up-to-three-location offers; custom scope is higher. Dollar denomination inferred from Arizona/US offering, not explicit USD label. Prices are offers, not national actual spending. Canadian medspa-inclusive medical SEO offer starts CAD750/month.
Used for:
Med spa and aestheticsMedical Board of California
Publication date unknown (live official guidance); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
US medspa licensure, ownership and clinical supervision are state-specific. California's Medical Board treats medical procedures as medical practice requiring qualified personnel; verify scope and credentials before producing treatment claims or clinician titles.
Used for:
Med spa and aestheticsHealth Canada
Published 11 August 2020; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Canada restricts consumer prescription-drug advertising. Health Canada specifically flags promotional Botox benefit claims, including some before/after imagery, procedure videos and testimonials. Ontario physician advertising also prohibits testimonials and has detailed imagery consent and placement conditions.
Used for:
Med spa and aestheticsUS Physical Therapy Inc. (public operator disclosure)
Published 25 February 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $25,000.00 to $80,000.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $100.00 · USD/attended visit · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorGross contribution margin: 15% to 30% · percent of collected revenue · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorIllustrative small clinic chip. Chiropractic survey collections average USD450,425/year (USD37,535/month), a self-selected sample. Canada 2024 annual SME means: chiro CAD301,900, therapist/audiologist group CAD268,400. No representative combined US/Canada clinic range exists; counts and professions differ.
Used for:
Physical therapy and chiropracticChiropractic Economics (trade publication survey, 107 self-selected responses)
Published 2025 (exact publication day unknown); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $25,000.00 to $80,000.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorTotal marketing share: 3% · percent of revenue · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorPayments per year: 12 · attended visits/customer/year · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorIllustrative small clinic chip. Chiropractic survey collections average USD450,425/year (USD37,535/month), a self-selected sample. Canada 2024 annual SME means: chiro CAD301,900, therapist/audiologist group CAD268,400. No representative combined US/Canada clinic range exists; counts and professions differ.
Used for:
Physical therapy and chiropracticISED / Statistics Canada
Publication date unknown (2024 data); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: publication date unknown (2024 data).
Monthly retained revenue: $25,000.00 to $80,000.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorTotal marketing share: 3% · percent of revenue · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorGross contribution margin: 15% to 30% · percent of collected revenue · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorIllustrative small clinic chip. Chiropractic survey collections average USD450,425/year (USD37,535/month), a self-selected sample. Canada 2024 annual SME means: chiro CAD301,900, therapist/audiologist group CAD268,400. No representative combined US/Canada clinic range exists; counts and professions differ.
Used for:
Physical therapy and chiropracticISED / Statistics Canada
Publication date unknown (2024 data); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: publication date unknown (2024 data).
Monthly retained revenue: $25,000.00 to $80,000.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorTotal marketing share: 3% · percent of revenue · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorGross contribution margin: 15% to 30% · percent of collected revenue · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorIllustrative small clinic chip. Chiropractic survey collections average USD450,425/year (USD37,535/month), a self-selected sample. Canada 2024 annual SME means: chiro CAD301,900, therapist/audiologist group CAD268,400. No representative combined US/Canada clinic range exists; counts and professions differ.
Used for:
Physical therapy and chiropracticLentz et al., Physical Therapy / Oxford University Press
Published 3 November 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Payments per year: 12 · attended visits/customer/year · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorRelationship horizon: 1 · years · Planning assumption
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorOne 12-visit episode within one year, not observed annual repeat frequency. Employer PT claims study median episode visits: 12 without copay versus 8 traditional, with wide variation. Chiro survey patient-visit average 34 per case is not 34 visits/year.
Used for:
Physical therapy and chiropracticLocaliQ (advertising vendor campaign study)
Published 13 January 2026 (updated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Organic versus paid enquiry cost: 1 · organic CPL / paid CPL ratio · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorParity scenario because no matched organic/paid PT/chiro CPL dataset found. LocaliQ PT paid-search CPL is USD32.79 and click-to-lead conversion 15.35%; these do not establish organic cost or assessment booking conversion.
Used for:
Physical therapy and chiropracticTM Blast (agency offer)
Publication date unknown (live offer); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $1,500.00 · USD/month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorTM Blast publishes this one-location chiropractic local SEO fee including website/Maps work and reporting. US denomination inferred from New York offering. Single vendor offer, not PT-wide mean or actual spending. Canada Create publishes chiropractic SEO from CAD1,500/month.
Used for:
Physical therapy and chiropracticCanada Create (agency offer)
Publication date unknown (live offer); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $1,500.00 · USD/month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Physical therapy and chiropractic: population and denominatorTM Blast publishes this one-location chiropractic local SEO fee including website/Maps work and reporting. US denomination inferred from New York offering. Single vendor offer, not PT-wide mean or actual spending. Canada Create publishes chiropractic SEO from CAD1,500/month.
Used for:
Physical therapy and chiropracticCollege of Physiotherapists of Ontario
Published 1 May 2025 (effective); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Ontario PT advertising must be truthful and verifiable, with no guaranteed outcomes or unsupported superiority; genuine testimonials require suitable consent. Standard effective May 2025.
Used for:
Physical therapy and chiropracticCollege of Chiropractors of Ontario
Published 28 November 2024 (approved); 21 February 2025 (effective); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Ontario chiropractic S-016 includes podcasts. Claims must be accurate, supported and within scope. Practice-specific testimonials are limited to the member's website with written consent and conditions; do not move those endorsements into a podcast. Current standard replaces older Advertising S-016.
Used for:
Physical therapy and chiropracticCalifornia Board of Chiropractic Examiners
Publication date unknown (live compilation); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
US physical therapists need licensing in the jurisdiction served. California chiropractic rules prohibit deceptive advertising and unlicensed practice. These examples require jurisdiction-specific review, not a uniform combined-profession checklist.
Used for:
Physical therapy and chiropracticFederation of State Boards of Physical Therapy
Publication date unknown (live guidance); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
US physical therapists need licensing in the jurisdiction served. California chiropractic rules prohibit deceptive advertising and unlicensed practice. These examples require jurisdiction-specific review, not a uniform combined-profession checklist.
Used for:
Physical therapy and chiropracticPelora Marketing (agency)
Published 2 October 2026 (page update); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorMayo Clinic
Published 15 January 2020; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorPractice Promotions (agency publisher)
Publication date unknown (live episode index); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorAmerican Dental Association
Publication date unknown (live episode index); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorAmerican Med Spa Association
Published 23 September 2026 (P&L episode); index publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorClio
Published 19 June 2026 (updated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 10% to 20% · percent of revenue · Planning assumption
Personal injury law: population and denominatorTotal marketing share: 2% to 10% · percent of revenue · Published input
Criminal defense: population and denominatorGrowth scenario chosen above general legal guidance. PILMMA describes some injury firms exceeding 20-30%; neither publication establishes a representative PI spending distribution.
Back to calculatorPILMMA
Published 17 June 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 10% to 20% · percent of revenue · Planning assumption
Personal injury law: population and denominatorGrowth scenario chosen above general legal guidance. PILMMA describes some injury firms exceeding 20-30%; neither publication establishes a representative PI spending distribution.
Used for:
Personal injury lawNolo / Martindale-Nolo
Publication date unknown current article; survey 2017; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
First customer payment: $5,000.00 to $20,000.00 · USD collected fee per acquired matter · Planning assumption
Personal injury law: population and denominatorSensitivity band for retained fees averaged across signed matters, including zero-fee cases. Historical 2017 Nolo average payout of $52,900 is successful-claim compensation, not firm revenue or expected fees.
Used for:
Personal injury lawFirst Page Sage
Published 30 June 2025 (page date; 2026 title); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Organic versus paid enquiry cost: 0.41402714932126694 · ratio organic CPL to paid search CPL · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Personal injury law: population and denominatorDerived from SEO $183 / Google Search Ads $442 per lead. Vendor study of 49 PI firms; campaigns mainly 2022-2024 despite 2026 title. Not a guaranteed future CPL.
Used for:
Personal injury lawFirmForte
Publication date unknown (live price menu); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $1,750.00 to $3,500.00 · USD per month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Personal injury law: population and denominatorOne vendor's live SEO/content menu; build fees and ad spend extra. Not a representative market survey.
Back to calculatorMyCase
Published 6 February 2026 (updated); cites 2024 report; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Enquiry to attended meeting: 40% to 60% · percent of new enquiries · Planning assumption
Personal injury law: population and denominatorMeeting to customer: 20% to 40% · percent of attended consults · Planning assumption
Personal injury law: population and denominatorAttended consult after screening. No credible practice-specific stage measure found; total lead conversion does not identify this stage.
Used for:
Personal injury lawClio
Published 8 May 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Organic enquiry share: 10% to 30% · percent of all new enquiries · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Personal injury law: population and denominatorUnmeasured search-share scenario. Referrals dominate many small firms; the survey reports firms' preferences, not lead shares.
Back to calculatorNew York Appellate Divisions
Published 27 May 2026; effective 1 June 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Attorney review of claims, credentials, client examples and solicitation must follow applicable state rules. New York changed rules in June 2026. Review crime-specific pages, case narratives and audio for confidential facts, outcome promises and misleading professional claims. A general legal explainer should not imply a client relationship or a guaranteed acquittal. Employment and immigration explainers require attorney review of current jurisdiction, eligibility, dates and procedure. Check multilingual versions and credentials under applicable advertising rules. Separate government filing fees from lawyer fees.
Back to calculatorState Bar of Texas
Published 7 March 2025 (effective compilation); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Attorney review of claims, credentials, client examples and solicitation must follow applicable state rules. New York changed rules in June 2026. Texas has conditional educational-media and website filing exemptions. Nonexempt ads generally require filing within 10 days after dissemination. Contingency-fee promotional content needs expense-liability wording where required; Texas Rule 7.02(c) specifically addresses whether the client owes litigation or other expenses. Review settlement examples for unjustified expectations and privacy. Review crime-specific pages, case narratives and audio for confidential facts, outcome promises and misleading professional claims. A general legal explainer should not imply a client relationship or a guaranteed acquittal. Employment and immigration explainers require attorney review of current jurisdiction, eligibility, dates and procedure. Check multilingual versions and credentials under applicable advertising rules. Separate government filing fees from lawyer fees.
Back to calculatorThe Florida Bar
Publication date unknown (living official guidance); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Attorney review of claims, credentials, client examples and solicitation must follow applicable state rules. New York changed rules in June 2026. Florida covered ads require filing 20 days before use; websites have an exemption. July 2026 timely/late fees: $250/$750.
Back to calculatorThe Florida Bar
Publication date unknown; fee update effective 2026-07-01; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Florida covered ads require filing 20 days before use; websites have an exemption. July 2026 timely/late fees: $250/$750.
Back to calculatorPwC
Published June 2025 (issued); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Gross contribution margin: 40% to 60% · percent of fee revenue · Planning assumption
Personal injury law: population and denominatorAssumed direct costs consume 40-60% of fees, including fair partner labor. Public PwC sample covers larger firms.
Back to calculatorNolo
Publication date unknown (search-index text); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $15,000.00 to $100,000.00 · USD per month · Planning assumption
Criminal defense: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $1,000.00 to $5,000.00 · USD fee per DUI engagement · Published input
Criminal defense: population and denominatorPlanning chip: 5-20 new fee-paying matters monthly at assumed $3,000-$5,000 total fees. Not survey revenue; actual revenue recognition differs from intake deposits.
Used for:
Criminal defenseFirst Page Sage
Published 8 October 2026 (updated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Organic versus paid enquiry cost: 0.7407407407407407 · ratio organic CPL to paid CPL · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Criminal defense: population and denominatorTransferred pooled legal-services vendor ratio: organic $580 / paid $783. Criminal-defense data unavailable; pooled paid and organic channels are not exclusively search.
Back to calculatorNolo / Martindale-Nolo
Published 17 July 2024 (updated); survey 2016; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
First customer payment: $2,500.00 to $15,000.00 · USD collected fee per acquired matter · Planning assumption
Employment and immigration law: population and denominatorMixed-practice scenario. Published immigration menu and historical employment fee evidence are incompatible populations. AILA explicitly does not report typical flat fees; use actual matter mix and include no-recovery outcomes.
Used for:
Employment and immigration lawAmerican Immigration Lawyers Association
Published 7 November 2022 (posted); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
First customer payment: $2,500.00 to $15,000.00 · USD collected fee per acquired matter · Planning assumption
Employment and immigration law: population and denominatorMixed-practice scenario. Published immigration menu and historical employment fee evidence are incompatible populations. AILA explicitly does not report typical flat fees; use actual matter mix and include no-recovery outcomes.
Used for:
Employment and immigration lawDonesky Law Firm
Publication date unknown (live fee menu; copyright 2018 is not publication); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $20,000.00 to $150,000.00 · USD per month · Planning assumption
Employment and immigration law: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $2,500.00 to $15,000.00 · USD collected fee per acquired matter · Planning assumption
Employment and immigration law: population and denominatorPlanning chip: 8-30 fee-equivalent matters monthly at assumed $2,500-$5,000. Consumer employment, employer counsel and immigration have different economics; change to actual collected revenue.
Used for:
Employment and immigration lawPELORA Marketing
Publication date unknown (live page); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorNational Society of Accountants
Published 2024 (copyright; exact publication date unstated); survey 2023; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorAssociation for Accounting Marketing
Published 28 July 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorAssociation for Accounting Marketing / Hinge Research Institute
Published 21 May 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorCPA.com / AICPA PCPS
Published 9 December 2024 (release); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorAccountant Web Design
Publication date unknown (live price menu); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorClio
Published September 2025 (PDF publication month); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Published September 2026 (updated through September); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorUS Treasury / Office of the Federal Register
Published 2 August 2011 (section effective); current eCFR text; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorInternal Revenue Service
Publication date unknown (current guidance; underlying rules historical); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorIRS Taxpayer Advocate Service
Published 20 March 2026; updated 23 March 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorAmerican Bar Association
Published 2023; podcast audience survey 2022; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorAICPA & CIMA
Published 21 July 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorCPA.com
Published 9 December 2024; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorNAHB
Published 11 September 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $83,333.33 to $416,666.67 · USD/month · Published input
Home builders and modular homes: population and denominatorAnnualized $1-$5 million band covering 38% of 2025 NAHB builder members. Annual median $3.7 million equals $308,333/month. Includes multiple builder activities; not a modular-only sample.
Used for:
Home builders and modular homesNAHB
Published 9 April 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Gross contribution margin: 18.2% to 20.7% · percent of company revenue · Published input
Home builders and modular homes: population and denominatorNAHB single-family-builder means in 2020 and 2023. Range of survey means, not current firm percentiles. No modular-only margin cohort found.
Used for:
Home builders and modular homesNAHB
Published 20 January 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 0.8% · percent of home sales revenue · Published input
Home builders and modular homes: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $665,298.00 · USD/home sale · Published input
Home builders and modular homes: population and denominator2024 NAHB sampled home-price breakdown marketing cost share. Sales commissions and overhead are separate. Not the share for every builder or a modular-only marketing budget; confirm all-channel scope.
Used for:
Home builders and modular homesFirst Page Sage (agency vendor study)
Published 8 October 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Organic versus paid enquiry cost: 0.656028 · organic CPL / paid CPL · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Home builders and modular homes: population and denominatorOrganic versus paid enquiry cost: 0.907258 · organic CPL / paid CPL · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Real estate brokerages: population and denominatorAssumed transfer of broad construction vendor ratio to builders/modular: $185 organic / $282 paid. No builder-only comparison.
Back to calculatorDo You Convert (homebuilder marketing vendor benchmarks)
Published 27 July 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Enquiry to attended meeting: 49% · percent of online-sales leads · Published input
Home builders and modular homes: population and denominatorMeeting to customer: 22% · percent of attended appointments · Published input
Home builders and modular homes: population and denominatorVendor Q2 2026 homebuilder lead-to-appointment benchmark 49%. Methodology discussion defines appointments as attended, using all lead sources handled by online sales. Not modular-specific.
Used for:
Home builders and modular homesNAR
Published 1 April 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Organic enquiry share: 20% · percent of all new qualified leads · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Home builders and modular homes: population and denominatorScenario, not measured organic share. NAR says 51% found their purchased home online; this includes portals and other channels and cannot be converted into builder organic leads.
Back to calculatorWebFX (agency price offer)
Publication date unknown live price page; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $2,500.00 to $5,000.00 · USD/month agency fees · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Home builders and modular homes: population and denominatorSEO supplier fees: $1,500.00 to $5,000.00 · USD/month agency fees · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Real estate brokerages: population and denominatorPlanning range for project, plan and community content, anchored around a live $3,000 general SEO offer. No representative builder/modular agency-spend study found. Setup, listings, media and podcast costs separate.
Back to calculatorCalifornia Contractors State License Board (CSLB)
Publication date unknown live guidance; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
California example, not a nationwide rule: contractor advertisements must carry the state license number. Verify license status, permitted trades and each operating state's disclosure requirements before publishing.
Used for:
Home builders and modular homesFederal Trade Commission (FTC)
Published 14 August 2024; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Review and testimonial content must not fabricate experience or buy sentiment-conditioned reviews. Check endorsements and client permissions before producing written or voiced proof.
Back to calculatorHUD / Office of the Federal Register, eCFR
Published current text as of 8 October 2026; original promulgation older; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Housing sales advertising, including oral statements, must not indicate preferences or discrimination based on protected characteristics. Review neighborhood descriptions, imagery, audience selection and podcast scripts. Fair Housing advertising rules cover written and oral housing statements. Review listings, market guides, neighborhood descriptions, photos and podcast scripts for discriminatory preferences or exclusion.
Back to calculatorGoogle Ads (official platform policy)
Publication date unknown live policy; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Google housing ads in the U.S. and Canada cannot target by age, gender, parental status, marital status or ZIP code. Check campaign and landing-page classification. Google housing advertising targeting restrictions apply to real-estate services as well as property listings in the U.S. and Canada.
Back to calculatorHUD Office of Policy Development and Research
Publication date unknown brief; publication age unverified; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Modular/factory-built homes follow local building codes; HUD-code manufactured homes are a different category. Verify the construction classification before making code, finance, placement or cost claims.
Used for:
Home builders and modular homesAhrefs (vendor survey)
Published 15 August 2024 (updated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $2,500.00 to $5,000.00 · USD/month agency fees · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Home builders and modular homes: population and denominatorSEO supplier fees: $1,500.00 to $5,000.00 · USD/month agency fees · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Real estate brokerages: population and denominatorPlanning range for project, plan and community content, anchored around a live $3,000 general SEO offer. No representative builder/modular agency-spend study found. Setup, listings, media and podcast costs separate.
Back to calculatorDo You Convert (vendor podcast and benchmark methodology discussion)
Published 19 August 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Enquiry to attended meeting: 49% · percent of online-sales leads · Published input
Home builders and modular homes: population and denominatorMeeting to customer: 22% · percent of attended appointments · Published input
Home builders and modular homes: population and denominatorVendor Q2 2026 homebuilder lead-to-appointment benchmark 49%. Methodology discussion defines appointments as attended, using all lead sources handled by online sales. Not modular-specific.
Used for:
Home builders and modular homesThe CMO Survey (Duke University, Deloitte, American Marketing Association)
Published March 2025 (release month; day not stated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 3% to 5% · percent of gross commission revenue · Planning assumption
Real estate brokerages: population and denominatorBudget scenario for a referral-led brokerage. CMO Survey broad real-estate mean 23.58% has only 7 responses and is not brokerage-specific. Use company commission revenue, not the value of homes sold.
Used for:
Real estate brokeragesNational Association of REALTORS (NAR)
Published 19 November 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $25,000.00 to $100,000.00 · USD/month gross commission revenue · Planning assumption
Real estate brokerages: population and denominatorIllustrative firm with 30-120 annual transaction sides at an assumed $10,000 gross company commission per side, divided by 12. Not property sales volume or agent personal income; official firm commission figures appear inconsistent.
Used for:
Real estate brokeragesNAR
Published 25 June 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $25,000.00 to $100,000.00 · USD/month gross commission revenue · Planning assumption
Real estate brokerages: population and denominatorIllustrative firm with 30-120 annual transaction sides at an assumed $10,000 gross company commission per side, divided by 12. Not property sales volume or agent personal income; official firm commission figures appear inconsistent.
Used for:
Real estate brokeragesNAR (professional association rules)
Published 1 January 2026 (effective edition); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
For REALTORS, Article 12 requires a truthful advertising picture and clear firm identity. Website licensing disclosures and third-party content permissions require review. This is an association code, not every state's law.
Used for:
Real estate brokeragesNAR (official consumer guidance)
Publication date unknown live guidance; 2024 practice changes; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
First customer payment: $10,000.00 · USD/company commission per closed side · Planning assumption
Real estate brokerages: population and denominatorIllustrative $400,000 property with separately assumed negotiated 2.5% company-side fee. Neither input is a measured norm. Commissions are negotiable; exclude the other brokerage's compensation.
Used for:
Real estate brokeragesFirmex, Axial and Divestopedia
Published August 2025 (file-path month; exact day not stated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $16,667.00 to $118,750.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption
M&A advisors and business brokers: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $40,000.00 to $285,000.00 · USD/completed engagement · Planning assumption
M&A advisors and business brokers: population and denominatorMeeting to customer: 20% · fraction of attended consultations · Planning assumption
M&A advisors and business brokers: population and denominatorScenario band: five completed engagements yearly at $40,000-$285,000 fees, divided by 12. Not a measured firm-revenue distribution.
Used for:
M&A advisors and business brokersInternational Business Brokers Association
Published January 2021 (file-path month; exact day not stated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $16,667.00 to $118,750.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption
M&A advisors and business brokers: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $40,000.00 to $285,000.00 · USD/completed engagement · Planning assumption
M&A advisors and business brokers: population and denominatorMeeting to customer: 20% · fraction of attended consultations · Planning assumption
M&A advisors and business brokers: population and denominatorScenario band: five completed engagements yearly at $40,000-$285,000 fees, divided by 12. Not a measured firm-revenue distribution.
Used for:
M&A advisors and business brokersGartner
Published 25 June 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 5% · fraction of revenue · Planning assumption
M&A advisors and business brokers: population and denominatorCash-budget planning allowance. Gartner's 7.8% is dominated by large enterprises and is not a broker benchmark; no comparable small-firm survey found.
Used for:
M&A advisors and business brokersGartner
Published 8 June 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 5% · fraction of revenue · Planning assumption
M&A advisors and business brokers: population and denominatorCash-budget planning allowance. Gartner's 7.8% is dominated by large enterprises and is not a broker benchmark; no comparable small-firm survey found.
Used for:
M&A advisors and business brokersPELORA Marketing
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $2,000.00 to $4,000.00 · USD/month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
M&A advisors and business brokers: population and denominatorPublic SEO/AEO/GEO asking range from a vendor serving this field; not evidence of typical actual client spending.
Back to calculatorFINRA
Published last listed amendment effective 16 August 2019; current rulebook checked; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Match the firm's registration model: ordinary FINRA members use Rule 2210; capital acquisition brokers use CAB Rule 221. Balanced, substantiated claims need review. State-only advisers need their applicable state rules checked. FINRA Rule 2210 applies to member broker-dealer communications, including relevant dual-registered firms, not every standalone RIA. FINRA rules are relevant when securities or variable-product communications occur through a member firm; ordinary P&C agency content is not automatically subject to FINRA.
Back to calculatorFINRA
Published effective 14 April 2017; current rulebook checked; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Match the firm's registration model: ordinary FINRA members use Rule 2210; capital acquisition brokers use CAB Rule 221. Balanced, substantiated claims need review.
Used for:
M&A advisors and business brokersUS Securities and Exchange Commission
Published 29 March 2023; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Federal M&A broker exemption is conditional. Do not imply every business broker is SEC-registered or exempt; the old no-action letter was withdrawn.
Used for:
M&A advisors and business brokersUS Government Publishing Office
Published 2024 Code edition; exemption enacted 29 December 2022; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Federal M&A broker exemption is conditional. Do not imply every business broker is SEC-registered or exempt; the old no-action letter was withdrawn.
Used for:
M&A advisors and business brokersGoogle Ads
Publication date unknown, continuously maintained policy; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
For campaigns within Google's financial-services policy, validate local-law disclosures, fees and claimed affiliations; verification depends on target location. Google financial-services campaigns require visible business and fee disclosures and substantiated affiliations. Check location-specific verification before campaign planning. For products within Google's financial-services policy, review destination disclosures and target-location regulations rather than assuming one national campaign approval.
Back to calculatorKitces Research
Published September 2026 (file-path month; exact day not stated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $19,583.33 to $137,500.00 · USD/month · Published input
Wealth management and RIAs: population and denominatorTotal marketing share: 2.6% · fraction of revenue · Published input
Wealth management and RIAs: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $10,279.00 · USD/customer/year · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Wealth management and RIAs: population and denominator2025 practice-revenue IQR $235,000-$1.65 million divided by 12; advice-centric sample, not all RIAs.
Used for:
Wealth management and RIAsCharles Schwab
Published 2024 (report year; exact publication date not stated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Relationship horizon: 10 · years · Planning assumption
Wealth management and RIAs: population and denominatorConservative planning horizon, not observed tenure. Historical 97% annual retention cannot establish a ten-year average relationship or future survival.
Used for:
Wealth management and RIAsKitces.com
Published 10 March 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Enquiry to attended meeting: 50% · fraction of unique enquiries · Planning assumption
Wealth management and RIAs: population and denominatorMeeting to customer: 25% · fraction of attended consultations · Planning assumption
Wealth management and RIAs: population and denominatorOrganic enquiry share: 0% · fraction of new enquiries · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Wealth management and RIAs: population and denominatorScreening scenario, not a survey. Published interview measures qualification, not attended consultations; no transferable appointment rate found.
Used for:
Wealth management and RIAsFirst Page Sage
Published 8 October 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Organic versus paid enquiry cost: 1 · organic CPL / paid CPL ratio · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Wealth management and RIAs: population and denominatorNeutral assumption. Vendor financial-services CPL is broader than RIAs and organic is not isolated to search; not a transferable saving.
Back to calculatorUS Securities and Exchange Commission
Published 28 April 2021; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
SEC Marketing Rule covers SEC-registered or required-to-register advisers. Substantiate claims, balance risks, check performance presentation and testimonial conditions, and keep advertisement records. State-only advisers need their applicable state rules checked. FINRA Rule 2210 applies to member broker-dealer communications, including relevant dual-registered firms, not every standalone RIA. Recorded promotional episodes and their clips need the applicable advertising review. Do not assume an edited podcast receives the SEC exclusion for extemporaneous live oral communications.
Used for:
Wealth management and RIAsUS Securities and Exchange Commission
Published section dates vary; latest visible section 15 January 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
SEC Marketing Rule covers SEC-registered or required-to-register advisers. Substantiate claims, balance risks, check performance presentation and testimonial conditions, and keep advertisement records.
Used for:
Wealth management and RIAsIndependent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America and Reagan Consulting
Published 11 August 2025 (publisher catalog date); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $67,780.58 to $156,275.17 · USD/month · Published input
Independent insurance agencies: population and denominatorRelationship horizon: 5 · years · Planning assumption
Independent insurance agencies: population and denominatorGross contribution margin: 40% to 60% · fraction of commission and fee revenue · Planning assumption
Independent insurance agencies: population and denominatorTwo selected high-performing agency cohorts' average annual revenues, $813,367 and $1,875,302, divided by 12. Not a population percentile band.
Used for:
Independent insurance agenciesBig I Agents Council for Technology / Agency Marketing Program
Published 6 December 2013 (file-name date); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 2% to 5% · fraction of commission and fee revenue · Planning assumption
Independent insurance agencies: population and denominatorVendor estimate used as a planning range, not survey evidence. Historical ACT figures use operating-budget share, not revenue.
Used for:
Independent insurance agenciesInsurance Agency Trader / Insurance Dudes
Published 14 April 2025; updated 16 May 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 2% to 5% · fraction of commission and fee revenue · Planning assumption
Independent insurance agencies: population and denominatorVendor estimate used as a planning range, not survey evidence. Historical ACT figures use operating-budget share, not revenue.
Used for:
Independent insurance agenciesBrightFire
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $290.00 to $999.00 · USD/month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Independent insurance agencies: population and denominatorObserved public asking-price span: BrightFire SEO bundle $290; Stratosphere marketing starts $799/$999. Bundled scopes differ; not an expenditure distribution.
Used for:
Independent insurance agenciesStratosphere
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $290.00 to $999.00 · USD/month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Independent insurance agencies: population and denominatorObserved public asking-price span: BrightFire SEO bundle $290; Stratosphere marketing starts $799/$999. Bundled scopes differ; not an expenditure distribution.
Used for:
Independent insurance agenciesNational Association of Insurance Commissioners
Published 2024 Spring edition; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
NAIC Model 880 restricts misleading coverage, premium and insurer claims, but a model is not binding law until adopted. Verify each state's enacted rules.
Used for:
Independent insurance agenciesMissouri Revisor of Statutes
Published effective 28 August 1991; current statute page checked; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Missouri example: RSMo 375.936 prohibits deceptive insurance advertising and policy misrepresentation. Coverage comparisons and scripts need policy-specific fact review.
Used for:
Independent insurance agenciesPELORA Marketing
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorKitces Research
Published 16 June 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorIndependent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America
Published 12 August 2026 (publisher catalog date); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorInternational Business Brokers Association
Publication date unknown archive; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorReagan Consulting
Publication date unknown index; episodes include 2025 and 2026 subjects; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorConnectWise / Service Leadership
Published 2026 edition; exact publication date unstated; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 1.8% · percent of revenue · Published input
IT providers and MSPs for midsize companies: population and denominatorOrganic enquiry share: 20% · percent of new enquiries · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
IT providers and MSPs for midsize companies: population and denominatorConnectWise reports Service Leadership internal best-in-class marketing budget of 1.8% of revenue. Not the whole sales-and-marketing function, a population median, or a recommended growth target. Report also says 51% spend under USD 10,000 annually; revenue denominator not given.
Back to calculatorKaseya
Published March 2024 (upload month; exact day unstated); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
First customer payment: $5,000.00 to $15,000.00 · USD/client/month · Planning assumption
IT providers and MSPs for midsize companies: population and denominatorRelationship horizon: 3 · years · Planning assumption
IT providers and MSPs for midsize companies: population and denominatorRepeat payment: $5,000.00 to $15,000.00 · USD/client/month · Planning assumption
IT providers and MSPs for midsize companies: population and denominatorMidsize-buyer scenario: 50 to 100 billed users at approximately USD 100 to 150/user/month, rounded. Historical Kaseya rates supply context, not measured midsize agreement values. Its general-client average-contract MRR bins include USD 2,501 to 5,000. Exclude setup and hardware unless explicitly modeled.
Back to calculatorFirst Page Sage
Published 8 October 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Organic versus paid enquiry cost: 0.6967 · ratio: organic CPL / paid CPL · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
IT providers and MSPs for midsize companies: population and denominatorOrganic versus paid enquiry cost: 0.6028 · ratio: organic CPL / paid CPL · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Civil engineering and AEC firms: population and denominatorOrganic versus paid enquiry cost: 0.5849 · ratio: organic CPL / paid CPL · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
B2B SaaS: population and denominatorDerived 418/600 from IT & Managed Services USD CPL. Vendor portfolio study, January 2022 to August 2026, per-industry sample sizes not disclosed. Organic is a channel group, not search alone; no causal savings promise.
Back to calculatorC4 Solutions
Published 14 September 2026; updated 21 September 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $3,000.00 to $10,000.00 · USD/month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
IT providers and MSPs for midsize companies: population and denominatorVendor guidance: entry USD 3,000 to 5,000; growth USD 5,000 to 10,000; nationwide can exceed USD 10,000. This encodes entry through growth scope, not a closed upper market bound or an independent buyer-spend survey.
Back to calculatorPublication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Google restricts third-party consumer technical support ads but expressly allows technical support supplied exclusively to businesses. Review service pages and ad destinations for an accurate B2B scope; do not assume all MSP advertising is prohibited.
Back to calculatorFederal Trade Commission
Published 23 November 1984; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Substantiate objective service, security, performance and savings claims before publication. Evidence checks and client approval add work to case studies and podcast scripts.
Used for:
IT providers and MSPs for midsize companiesCivil engineering and AEC firmsB2B SaaSMarketing and web agenciesFederal Trade Commission
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Substantiate objective service, security, performance and savings claims before publication. Evidence checks and client approval add work to case studies and podcast scripts. No general licensing-board content review applies to ordinary agency services in the sources reviewed. Client work in regulated sectors needs that sector's own review rules; this is a scope limitation, not a blanket legal exemption.
Used for:
IT providers and MSPs for midsize companiesCivil engineering and AEC firmsB2B SaaSMarketing and web agenciesDeltek
Published 25 September 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $155,568.00 to $777,838.00 · USD/month of net service revenue · Planning assumption
Civil engineering and AEC firms: population and denominatorGross contribution margin: 35% to 50% · percent of net service revenue · Planning assumption
Civil engineering and AEC firms: population and denominatorSelected 10 to 50 employee design-consultancy scenario: USD 186,681 median annual net revenue/employee multiplied by assumed headcount then divided by 12, rounded. Not a surveyed revenue distribution. Net revenue excludes pass-throughs; do not mix it with gross billings or construction-company turnover.
Used for:
Civil engineering and AEC firmsZweig Group
Published 24 September 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 3% to 6% · percent of net service revenue · Planning assumption
Civil engineering and AEC firms: population and denominatorEditable planning band allowing marketing staff and content plus some external support. Zweig's public release gives a USD 400,000 median annual marketing budget but no matching revenue denominator; no percentage can responsibly be derived. Seller-doer pursuit time and sales costs may be separate.
Used for:
Civil engineering and AEC firmsDeltek
Published 13 May 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Meeting to customer: 25% · percent of attended scoping consultations · Planning assumption
Civil engineering and AEC firms: population and denominatorConservative scenario, not observed inbound close rate. Deltek reported 50% median proposal win rate in 2025; its 2026 commentary says win rates declined. Submitted, selected proposals are a later denominator than consultations; do not transplant the 50% rate.
Used for:
Civil engineering and AEC firmsDeltek
Published 9 July 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Meeting to customer: 25% · percent of attended scoping consultations · Planning assumption
Civil engineering and AEC firms: population and denominatorConservative scenario, not observed inbound close rate. Deltek reported 50% median proposal win rate in 2025; its 2026 commentary says win rates declined. Submitted, selected proposals are a later denominator than consultations; do not transplant the 50% rate.
Used for:
Civil engineering and AEC firmsSocial Animal
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $5,000.00 to $12,000.00 · USD/month · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
Civil engineering and AEC firms: population and denominatorVendor's general B2B pricing block advertises USD 5,000 to 12,000/month; the engineering FAQ says USD 5,000 to 10,000/month. This preset preserves the broader displayed band and flags the inconsistency. Supplier price evidence, not typical buyer spending; confirm currency and scope before reliance.
Used for:
Civil engineering and AEC firmsNational Society of Professional Engineers
Published July 2019 (revision); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
NSPE's professional code requires accurate qualifications, truthful public statements, proper project credit and protection of client confidences. Get project and image permission and engineer review. NSPE is a professional society, not the licensing regulator.
Used for:
Civil engineering and AEC firmsTexas Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors
Published 7 January 2026 (compilation effective date); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Texas is a jurisdiction example: board rules address truthful engineering assertions, false or misleading solicitation, confidentiality and unlicensed practice. Check every state served and the accuracy of licensed-firm and professional credentials. Licensed technical review adds work; the Texas compilation is not a national rule.
Used for:
Civil engineering and AEC firmsSaaS Capital
Published 10 June 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $250,000.00 to $416,667.00 · USD/month equivalent ARR · Planning assumption
B2B SaaS: population and denominatorTotal marketing share: 8% · percent of ARR · Published input
B2B SaaS: population and denominatorSelected USD 3 million to 5 million ARR cohort divided by 12, rounded. Cohort selection is an assumption, not the typical revenue range of all small and midsize SaaS firms. ARR equivalent is not necessarily recognized monthly revenue.
Used for:
B2B SaaSSaaS Capital
Published 14 August 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $250,000.00 to $416,667.00 · USD/month equivalent ARR · Planning assumption
B2B SaaS: population and denominatorFirst customer payment: $25,278.00 · USD/client/annual contract · Published input; context only, no numeric calculation input
B2B SaaS: population and denominatorSelected USD 3 million to 5 million ARR cohort divided by 12, rounded. Cohort selection is an assumption, not the typical revenue range of all small and midsize SaaS firms. ARR equivalent is not necessarily recognized monthly revenue.
Used for:
B2B SaaSHigh Alpha
Published 11 November 2025 (release); metrics Q2 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: 11 November 2025 (release); metrics Q2 2025.
Gross contribution margin: 60% to 85% · percent of software revenue · Published input
B2B SaaS: population and denominator2025 High Alpha survey software gross-margin interquartile range for USD 1 million to 5 million ARR firms; median 77%. Includes the selected cohort but is broader. Survey of 800+ companies, mostly US; Q2 2025 metrics. Implementation and AI inference costs can change realized margins.
Used for:
B2B SaaSSaaS Capital
Published 24 April 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Relationship horizon: 3 · years · Planning assumption
B2B SaaS: population and denominatorConservative planning horizon, not measured logo retention. SaaS Capital reports gross revenue retention, which includes contraction and cannot be inverted into customer lifespan. Renewal, expansion and discounting should be handled separately.
Used for:
B2B SaaSFirst Page Sage
Published 11 June 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Enquiry to attended meeting: 20.91% · percent of new enquiries · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
B2B SaaS: population and denominatorMeeting to customer: 17.64% · percent of attended consultations · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
B2B SaaS: population and denominatorProxy scenario: vendor SEO lead-to-MQL 41% multiplied by MQL-to-SQL 51%. SQL means sales-qualified stage, not a verified attended consultation. Vendor clients generally larger than this preset; treat as assumption and replace with attended-demo data.
Source stage does not establish this attended-meeting denominator. Enter your actual matching stage; original research is retained below.
This measure is incompatible with the calculation and is not loaded as an input.
Used for:
B2B SaaSPublished 23 September 2025; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Google's subscription and trial advertising rules require clear payment model and full costs. Free-trial promotion needs duration and subsequent automatic-charge disclosures. Review ads, comparison pages and conversion destinations together.
Used for:
B2B SaaSSE Ranking / Duda
Published 13 December 2024; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
SEO supplier fees: $3,000.00 to $10,000.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
B2B SaaS: population and denominatorSEO supplier fees: $1,000.00 to $5,000.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Marketing and web agencies: population and denominatorChosen specialist B2B content/technical program scenario. No credible representative SaaS buyer-spend distribution found. Generic supplier surveys include cheaper small/local programs and do not establish this SaaS-specific range.
Back to calculatorFederal Trade Commission
Published June 2023 (updated guidance); checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Customer endorsements must reflect real experience and material connections must be disclosed. Obtain permission and review evidence for case-study performance claims and sponsored audio. Agencies can be responsible for deceptive endorsements and undisclosed material connections. Verify testimonial permission, client outcomes and sponsorship disclosure in text and audio.
Back to calculatorFederal Trade Commission
Publication date unknown; original publication date not established; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Commercial B2B email is subject to CAN-SPAM. Review outsourced distribution templates and opt-out handling as part of content operations. CAN-SPAM applies to commercial B2B email and can involve both the promoted business and service provider. Distribution operations need accurate message identification and functioning opt-out processes.
Back to calculatorPromethean Research
Published 19 April 2026; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Monthly retained revenue: $50,000.00 to $250,000.00 · USD/month · Planning assumption
Marketing and web agencies: population and denominatorSelected USD 0.6 million to 3 million annual planning band, not survey percentiles. Promethean's 2025 design and marketing category means were USD 1.77 million and USD 1.96 million annually. Their sample means do not define a typical firm distribution.
Used for:
Marketing and web agenciesPromethean Research
Published 2026 edition; exact publication date unstated; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Total marketing share: 5% · percent of revenue · Planning assumption
Marketing and web agencies: population and denominatorChosen marketing-only share below Promethean's 7% combined sales-and-marketing average, which includes salaries/media. The split is not published here; 5% is an editable allocation assumption.
Used for:
Marketing and web agenciesPromethean Research
Published 2023 edition; July upload; exact day unstated; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Gross contribution margin: 45% · percent of revenue · Published input
Marketing and web agencies: population and denominatorHistorical arithmetic: 100% minus 55% COGS guidance in 2023 report page 16, drawing on 2022 outlook. A published industry guideline, not a 2026 observed average. Current net-profit statistics are not gross margin; overwrite with accounts.
Used for:
Marketing and web agenciesAgencyAnalytics
Published 2026 edition; exact publication date unstated; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Relationship horizon: 2 to 5 · years · Published input
Marketing and web agencies: population and denominatorOrganic enquiry share: 15% · percent of new enquiries · Planning assumption; context only, no numeric calculation input
Marketing and web agencies: population and denominatorModal self-reported average-client-lifespan band: 43% of surveyed agencies selected two to five years. Vendor survey of 494 professionals, February to April 2026. Not a survival curve or population mean; validate for project versus retainer clients.
Used for:
Marketing and web agenciesPELORA Marketing
Publication date unknown; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorMSP Sales Podcast
Publication date unknown show page; latest visible episode 2026-10-05; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorSounds Profitable / American Public Media / Signal Hill Insights
Published 14 January 2025; report December 2024; fieldwork June 2024; checked 12 October 2026.
Data period: not separately specified; check the population notes.
Context only; no numeric input.
Background research from the source inventory. It provides context, without setting a numeric planning input.
Back to calculatorEvery starting point is listed below with its original unit, population and compatibility limits. Research checked 12 October 2026. Replace planning assumptions with your own figures where possible.
Your retained monthly revenue and marketing share set your total marketing budget. We subtract commitments you will keep elsewhere, then apply your chosen program share to what remains. If those commitments exceed the budget, we show the overspend separately and leave no monthly allocation. Comparable current spend is for comparison only.
Your acquisition allowance comes from payments collected within your recovery window, after direct delivery costs and according to the share you choose. Recurring and introductory/repeat models assume evenly spaced payments collected at the end of each period, with the first receipt at the end of the first period. They count only complete periods within both your relationship horizon and recovery window. A 1.5-month window at 12 payments per year counts one payment, not one and a half. Upfront or irregular collections need a separate cash-flow check; a one-off fee is counted once, only when you confirm collection in time. The remainder funds overhead and profit.
The per-enquiry limit reflects both the share of enquiries that attend a meeting and the share of those meetings that become customers. Ecommerce uses your new-customers-per-session rate instead; checkout completion remains context. To find the enquiries or sessions your goal would require, we work back through the matching conversion rate and round upward to a whole enquiry or session. Zero conversion cannot meet a positive goal.
Explain eligibility, retained service fees and treatment limits without unsupported medical claims. Payment model: intro repeat. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the clinics and health systems industry guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD per month
Scenario: 100-500 active patients at an assumed $150 monthly retained service fee. Patient counts and fee mix are assumptions, not a typical-size survey. Exclude pharmacy sales not retained by clinic.
Published proxy · Source unit: USD initial service engagement
Hone Plus/Premium starting fees, from-price examples, not industry averages. Medication excluded; ongoing fees $135/$155. Use separate repeat fees for LTV; this is a hormone proxy, not peptide pricing.
Planning assumption · Source unit: billing periods per active year
Monthly-billing scenario, not 12 clinical visits or a measured purchase frequency. Multiply by retained months/12; account for different initial and repeat fees.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
Conservative 6-12-month commercial planning horizon. No credible clinic-retention cohort found; chronic treatment indication is not proof of commercial retention.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of service revenue
Planning range assumes direct clinician, lab and treatment costs consume 40-60% of service revenue. Include owner clinical labor at market cost; not an observed gross or net margin.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of qualified enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Scenario assumes a meaningful share does not schedule or attend after price, access and eligibility discussion. No representative published attended-consultation rate found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended consultations · Stage: paying-customer
Planning scenario for paid treatment after clinical eligibility review. No representative published close rate; prescriptions must follow clinical need, not a sales target.
Planning assumption · Source unit: organic CPL divided by paid CPL
Neutral editable placeholder assumes equal costs, not a measured specialty comparison. Do not infer an organic cost advantage.
Published input · Source unit: USD per month
Published general-healthcare supplier estimate; not specialty invoices. Excludes media and podcast production.
Published proxy · Source unit: USD per repeat service month
Hone Plus/Premium ongoing service fees. Same two plans as the initial fees; a hormone proxy, not peptide prices. Medication excluded.
Population and denominator: Hone Plus/Premium memberships
Substantiate clinical claims in every promotional format, including podcasts.
Sensitive health targeting needs Google audience-policy review.
Check self-pay estimate duties and clearly explain excluded charges.
Review each peptide's current FDA status; withdrawn nominations are not approval.
LegitScript says advisory peptide votes do not authorize promotion or compounding.
Prescription telemedicine needs category-specific Google/LegitScript checks; Meta access was blocked.
State-specific example: Texas delegated-care advertising identifies the supervising physician.
Red flags include hidden clinicians, paper-only supervision and unsupported results.
Distinguish service fees from medication prices and clinical eligibility from a sales target. Payment model: intro repeat. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Read the medical weight loss and glp-1 clinics guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD per month
Scenario: 100-500 active patients at an assumed $150 retained care fee. Counts are assumed. Exclude patient payments to pharmacies; bundled drug revenue needs its own direct-cost accounting.
Published input · Source unit: USD first membership month
Ro introductory service fee, not a clinic average or medication price. Recurring monthly plan is $149; prepaid monthly-equivalent prices differ. Never multiply the $39 promotion to estimate recurring revenue.
Planning assumption · Source unit: billing periods per active year
Monthly-membership scenario, not dose frequency or actual clinical visits. For repeat-month LTV use retained months and the actual ongoing fee, not the promotional first-month charge.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
Assumed 3-9 retained paid months. Published medication discontinuation supports caution about long LTV, but does not establish this clinic-retention range.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of service revenue
Service-fee model assumes direct care/support/lab costs at 40-60% of retained service fees. Not a published margin. Bundled medication packages must use actual drug costs and lower margins where warranted.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of qualified enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Scenario allows for affordability and scheduling drop-off. No credible industry attended-consultation benchmark found; do not substitute paid click-to-lead conversion.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended consultations · Stage: paying-customer
Scenario includes clinically ineligible people and people declining out-of-pocket costs. No published representative close rate found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: organic CPL divided by paid CPL
Neutral editable placeholder assumes equal costs, not a measured specialty comparison. Do not infer an organic cost advantage.
Published input · Source unit: USD per month
Published general-healthcare supplier estimate; not specialty invoices. Excludes media and podcast production.
Published input · Source unit: USD per repeat membership month
Ro ongoing monthly service fee. Single supplier, medication excluded; prepaid equivalents differ.
Population and denominator: Ro monthly membership, excluding medication
Substantiate clinical claims in every promotional format, including podcasts.
Sensitive health targeting needs Google audience-policy review.
Check self-pay estimate duties and clearly explain excluded charges.
Compounded GLP-1 promotion must avoid equivalence, generic and misleading compounder or FDA-approval claims.
503A/503B and copy restrictions require current review; added B12 is not automatic permission.
FDA red flags include absent screening, clinician access or trustworthy pharmacy sourcing.
Check prescription-service Google/LegitScript eligibility; Meta text was blocked.
State-specific care, licensing and jurisdiction checks apply to telemedicine and partners.
Marketing enforcement is current: FDA issued 30 telehealth warning letters in March 2026.
Review treatment status and clinical claims with a qualified expert before publication. Payment model: one off. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the clinics and health systems industry guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD per month
Scenario: 10-40 lawful treatment episodes per month at an assumed $3,000 realized fee. No public representative revenue distribution found. Does not model or validate unapproved therapies.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD per treatment episode
Illustrative cash-pay episode fee, not a published average. Historical 2019 provider range $1,500-$9,000 mixes PRP and other procedures; cannot establish today's price or legality. Replace with lawful service's collected fee.
Planning assumption · Source unit: episodes per model year
One paid episode per acquired patient; no assumed repeat injection demand. Include all bundled visits in the episode rather than charging them again in LTV.
Planning assumption · Source unit: model years
One-episode accounting horizon, not measured retention or clinical treatment duration. With frequency 1, lifetime episode count remains 1.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of episode revenue
Illustrative direct procedure/clinician/lab cost share 40-60%. No representative public gross-margin study found; net-profit claims from aesthetics do not establish this metric.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of qualified enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Scenario reflects access, evidence and price questions before an attended evaluation. No defensible industry booking-rate study found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended consultations · Stage: paying-customer
Scenario includes appropriate clinical non-treatment decisions. No credible representative close-rate study found; never treat every evaluation as a sales opportunity.
Planning assumption · Source unit: organic CPL divided by paid CPL
Neutral editable placeholder assumes equal costs, not a measured specialty comparison. Do not infer an organic cost advantage.
Published input · Source unit: USD per month
Published general-healthcare supplier estimate; not specialty invoices. Excludes media and podcast production.
Substantiate clinical claims in every promotional format, including podcasts.
Sensitive health targeting needs Google audience-policy review.
Check self-pay estimate duties and clearly explain excluded charges.
FDA registration or trial listing does not establish lawful marketing; verify product-specific approval and indication.
Do not reuse the 2021 statement that only cord-blood stem-cell products are approved.
Google restricts speculative/cell promotions, with approved-product and educational exceptions.
State-specific example: California board guidance expects real supervision and disclosed risks.
Red flags: broad cure claims, missing product provenance and pressure to buy unsupported treatment.
Current Meta healthcare creative policy could not be retrieved; certification alone is not approval.
Protect patient privacy and explain appropriate care, capacity and payment boundaries. Payment model: one off. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the clinics and health systems industry guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD per month
Residential scenario: 4-12 paid 28-day episodes monthly at a single provider's 2025 example fees, with rounded revenue endpoints. Admission volume and fee mix are assumed, not a typical-center survey. Outpatient clinics must use collected visit revenue and capacity.
Published input · Source unit: USD per 28 day residential episode
Silver Hill's 2025 DBT-S/Resilience and Steward program fees. Older-than-12-month single-provider examples, not a national average or guaranteed 2026 quote. Medications and non-routine labs excluded; outpatient visits need different units.
Planning assumption · Source unit: episodes per model year
One acquired-patient episode, with all included care counted once. No assumed repeat admission revenue; outpatient users must replace this with actual visit frequency.
Planning assumption · Source unit: model years
One-episode accounting horizon, not a year of treatment or measured retention. At frequency 1, lifetime episode count is 1; the sourced price examples cover 28 days.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of episode revenue
Planning range assumes direct licensed-clinician, nursing, residential delivery and support costs consume 50-70% of collected episode revenue. No representative cash-pay gross-margin survey located; hospital EBITDA or net margin cannot substitute.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of qualified enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Attended assessment scenario after level-of-care, capacity and affordability screening. No representative published attended-assessment rate; call quality and payer mix materially differ.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended assessments · Stage: paying-customer
Appropriate paid admission/first session after attended assessment, a scenario only. Do not equate insurer authorization or phone leads with admissions.
Published input · Source unit: organic CPL divided by paid CPL
Derived vendor addiction-treatment ratio: $232/$384. Not independently validated; not ordinary psychotherapy or SEO-only. Use comparison context, not guaranteed savings or an automatic CAC reduction.
Published input · Source unit: USD per month
Published general-healthcare supplier estimate; not specialty invoices. Excludes media and podcast production.
Substantiate clinical claims in every promotional format, including podcasts.
Sensitive health targeting needs Google audience-policy review.
Check self-pay estimate duties and clearly explain excluded charges.
Covered addiction ads require Google/LegitScript certification; Meta text was blocked.
Ordinary psychotherapy is not automatically covered by addiction-ad certification.
Covered Part 2 programs need patient-record confidentiality review, including stories and attribution.
Florida prohibits patient-referral kickbacks subject to exceptions; review per-admission marketing fees.
Red flags include unclear care level, incentivized referrals and unsupported recovery guarantees.
Explain membership inclusions and safe clinical screening without inventing retention. Payment model: recurring. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Read the longevity or iv therapy clinics guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD per month
IV-led scenario: 50-200 paying members at assumed $300 realized monthly revenue, rounded from one provider's $299 plan. Counts assumed. Not comprehensive longevity-program revenue; replace for annual diagnostics packages.
Published input · Source unit: USD first basic IV membership month
The Cure IV Basic includes one IV/month. Single-provider membership price, not an average walk-in drip or comprehensive longevity assessment fee.
Planning assumption · Source unit: billing periods per active year
One billed Basic membership period per month while retained. Contract design does not establish population visit frequency; unused included IVs do not create new revenue.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
Assumed 3-12-month commercial membership horizon. No credible published retention distribution for cash-pay longevity/IV clinics found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of IV service revenue
Planning range assumes direct nursing, sterile supplies, ingredients and medical oversight consume 40-60% of revenue. Not a measured margin; include mobile travel if offered.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of qualified enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Attended eligibility/booking assessment scenario for an IV-led clinic. No representative benchmark; longevity assessment funnels may be very different.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended assessments · Stage: paying-customer
Scenario for eligible people choosing a paid IV service. No published representative close rate; this is not permission to bypass clinical screening.
Planning assumption · Source unit: organic CPL divided by paid CPL
Neutral editable placeholder assumes equal costs, not a measured specialty comparison. Do not infer an organic cost advantage.
Published input · Source unit: USD per month
Published general-healthcare supplier estimate; not specialty invoices. Excludes media and podcast production.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD first basic IV membership month
Equal-payment model convention for this billing schedule. Confirm your repeat payment has the same retained value. The Cure IV Basic includes one IV/month. Single-provider membership price, not an average walk-in drip or comprehensive longevity assessment fee.
Population and denominator: The Cure IV Basic includes one IV/month. Single-provider membership price, not an average walk-in drip or comprehensive longevity assessment fee.
Substantiate clinical claims in every promotional format, including podcasts.
Sensitive health targeting needs Google audience-policy review.
Check self-pay estimate duties and clearly explain excluded charges.
IV disease and longevity benefit claims need evidence; FTC has enforced against unsupported IV claims.
Texas delegated-care rules include IV hydration and supervising-physician advertising identification.
California board guidance flags unrealistic promises, hidden supervision and missing complication support.
Prescription longevity ads need Google/LegitScript scope checks; Meta text was blocked.
Peptide additions require molecule-specific review, including current certification restrictions.
Answer patient preparation questions with clinician review and privacy-safe examples. Payment model: recurring. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Read the specialty medical practices guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD/month
Illustrative collected-revenue band for one to several outpatient clinicians, not an observed US distribution. Canada: 2024 physician-office SME revenue middle two quartiles CAD212,000-622,000/year, or CAD17,667-51,833/month; mean CAD489,400/year. Includes generalists; no currency conversion or US extrapolation.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/attended visit
Illustrative initial collected visit revenue. One dermatology practice lists new-patient self-pay fees USD160-485 by complexity, including USD245 for 99203. Not an average across specialties, insurers or Canada. Use total collected payer plus patient receipts, not patient copay alone; procedures require their own preset.
Planning assumption · Source unit: attended visits/customer/year
One initial visit plus one follow-up each year is a planning scenario, not published typical utilization. Use the same collected value basis for repeat visits, which may actually reimburse less.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
Short two-year revenue horizon for repeat outpatient care; no defensible cross-specialty US/Canada retention benchmark found. For a one-off procedure use frequency=1 and lifespan=1, with firstValue equal to the full episode value.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of collected revenue
Illustrative gross contribution after clinical labour and treatment supplies, before fixed overhead, marketing and tax. No comparable cross-specialty delivery-cost series found. Canada reports 97.8% accounting gross margin but classifies much labour as indirect; do not use that percentage as acquisition headroom.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of qualified enquiries booked · Stage: incompatible
Adjacent Invoca 2026 healthcare benchmark: 45% of qualified phone leads convert on-call to an appointment. Specialty clinics are not a separately reported segment; applying it to all enquiries is an assumption. Booked appointment is not attendance.
Source stage does not establish this attended-meeting denominator. Enter your actual matching stage; original research is retained below.
This source measures an incompatible stage or unit. Its value is context only and is not loaded as a numeric input.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended consults becoming treatment customers · Stage: paying-customer
Illustrative progression from attended consultation to subsequent paid treatment. No suitable specialty-wide source found. If the first consultation is itself the paid customer event, omit this second stage or set 100%; do not multiply it against the same conversion event twice.
Planning assumption · Source unit: organic CPL / paid CPL ratio
Adjacent healthcare agency study reports organic USD348 versus paid USD363 per lead; 348/363=0.9587. Applying that broad, undisclosed-size sample to specialty patient enquiries is an assumption. Costs must include content, agency fees and internal labour, with identical lead qualification and attribution windows.
Published input · Source unit: USD/month
Vendor guide reports this standard medical-practice SEO retainer range; specialized growth plans separately USD2,500-7,500. Publication date and pricing survey methodology are absent. Reported vendor estimate, not proof of actual bills or a Workhacker quote; media and setup can be additional.
US HIPAA-covered practices: review PHI use in testimonials, case stories and marketing, obtain required authorization, and check exceptions rather than assuming all communications need authorization. Tracking review must reflect HHS's court notice: IP plus a visit to an unauthenticated health page alone is not automatically PHI under the vacated portion.
Ontario physician advertising includes third-party unpaid web content. Claims must be verifiable and evidence-supported; testimonials, comparisons and superiority claims are prohibited. Before/after imagery has specific consent, presentation and distribution limits. These Ontario rules are not a Canada-wide blanket ban.
Canada prescription-drug consumer advertising is restricted by C.01.044 to names, price and quantity. Check named-drug content separately from general service education; apply provincial privacy law and appropriate express consent for sensitive health information.
Google restricts prescription terms/services, experimental treatments and some specialty services. Health-related personalized audiences face separate restrictions. Check treatment, location, destination and certification before allocating paid media.
For health products featured by a clinic, FTC guidance requires truthful claims and suitable scientific substantiation. Reserve clinician review for scripts, articles, show notes and promotional snippets. This is an operational recommendation, not a sourced number of review hours.
Help patients understand options while separating booked visits from attended treatment. Payment model: recurring. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Read the dental practices guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD/month
Illustrative collected-revenue chip for a small general practice, not a measured range. ADA 2025 mean gross billings: USD965,660/dentist/year (USD80,472/month). Canada SME dental-office mean: CAD799,000/year (CAD66,583/month); upper-middle revenue quartile CAD397,000-1,161,000/year. Billings per dentist and revenue per business differ.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/attended first visit
Illustrative routine first visit assuming full collection. One New Jersey practice offers USD250 exam/X-rays/cleaning/scan, regular USD535. Promotional fee is not national average collections. Orthodontic, implant and cosmetic case values need separate inputs.
Planning assumption · Source unit: attended visits/customer/year
Two preventive visits per year is a care scenario; CDA describes six-month exams for many patients but individualized intervals. Guidance is not observed purchases and does not mean all patients buy twice annually.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
A conservative three-year modeling horizon, not measured retention. No suitably defined national practice-relationship duration found. Do not infer years from the percentage of patients who return.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of collected revenue
Scenario after direct clinician/provider compensation, supplies and lab costs, before fixed overhead. ADA cost guidance does not report this margin. Canada accounting gross margin is 91.6%, net profit 34.7%, with much labour indirect; neither may silently replace the calculator definition.
Published input · Source unit: percent of qualified phone leads booked · Stage: incompatible
Invoca July 2026 dental benchmark. Denominator is qualified phone leads; outcome is booked on the call, not attended visits. Applying it to all forms, missed calls or raw calls would be an assumption. Source is vendor customer data, not a population survey.
Source stage does not establish this attended-meeting denominator. Enter your actual matching stage; original research is retained below.
This source measures an incompatible stage or unit. Its value is context only and is not loaded as a numeric input.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended consults accepting paid treatment · Stage: paying-customer
Illustrative treatment acceptance. Planet DDS reports 58% case acceptance in 2025 Denticon data across more than 5,200 practices. Treatment plans are not new consults; applying that measure to this stage is not a sourced conversion benchmark. For paid first-visit acquisition omit a second close stage.
Planning assumption · Source unit: organic CPL / paid CPL ratio
Conservative parity scenario until comparable fully loaded costs and qualified leads are available. No defensible matched dental organic/paid CPL series found. Organic traffic is not free when production and agency costs are counted.
Published input · Source unit: USD/month
Published Lifted Websites offers for local and multi-location dental SEO; custom work starts higher. US-dollar interpretation follows its Arizona/US offering; page uses dollar signs. Not observed client spending. Canada vendor lists CAD1,200 single-clinic and CAD2,000 growing-practice plans.
US dental advertising: ADA ethics prohibits materially misleading promotions and restricts referral fees. Relevant state licensing and advertising law still applies; review specialist titles, fee claims and testimonial wording for the jurisdiction.
Ontario dental rules add restrictions on testimonials, superiority, incentives/free services and fee-splitting. Procedure advertising needs appropriate general-practitioner or specialist disclosure. Ontario restrictions are not uniform national Canadian rules.
HIPAA-covered US practices must review patient stories, marketing authorization and tracking disclosures. Canadian practices need applicable federal/provincial privacy controls, including appropriate consent for sensitive information. Include these checks in content and audio production.
Google health-personalization restrictions and healthcare advertising policies can affect condition- or procedure-specific campaigns. Review paid destinations separately from educational articles.
Keep treatment claims, imagery permissions and patient expectations under expert review. Payment model: recurring. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the clinics and health systems industry guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD/month
Illustrative small/midsize location chip, not sourced percentile boundaries. AmSpa 2024 report recap: mean USD1,398,833/year = USD116,569/month, based on older 2023 observations. Zenoti's 2025 platform median location revenue is $1.86m/year, but North America currency normalization is not established. No Canada-only operating cohort found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/attended first treatment
Illustrative initial collected treatment value. AmSpa average all-visit spend is USD527; Zenoti median all-visit ticket $216. Neither measures first transaction, and mixes differ. Choose this value for a treatment, not a free consultation or total package.
Planning assumption · Source unit: attended treatments/customer/year
Conservative mixed-service scenario. Vendor advice distinguishes occasional visitors and frequent members, without representative purchase-frequency methodology. Treatment schedule is not proof of actual return purchases; do not prescribe clinical frequency from this calculator.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
Short two-year scenario; no comparable cohort-based relationship length found. AmSpa 73% repeat-patient share is not annual retention and cannot be converted into lifetime years.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of collected treatment revenue
Vendor guide recommends 60-70% gross margin as a target, not measured typical profitability. Scenario includes supplies and direct treatment-provider costs, excludes fixed overhead, marketing and tax. Source uses inconsistent cost examples; require a practice-specific override.
Published input · Source unit: percent of leads booking a consult · Stage: incompatible
Reported directional range from one agency's medspa portfolio, not representative US/Canada industry mean. Cohort size and observation period are undisclosed. Booked consultation is not attendance.
Source stage does not establish this attended-meeting denominator. Enter your actual matching stage; original research is retained below.
This source measures an incompatible stage or unit. Its value is context only and is not loaded as a numeric input.
Published input · Source unit: percent of consults becoming paying patients · Stage: incompatible
Same agency's reported consult-close range, often paid during the visit. Attendance denominator is not fully documented; apply to attended consultations provisionally and supply a separate show rate if using bookings. Not verified for Canadian practices.
Source stage does not establish this attended-meeting denominator. Enter your actual matching stage; original research is retained below.
This source measures an incompatible stage or unit. Its value is context only and is not loaded as a numeric input.
Planning assumption · Source unit: organic CPL / paid CPL ratio
Conservative parity until matched practice data exists. No reproducible medspa organic-versus-paid CPL study with consistent cost allocation and qualification found. Do not promise a fixed organic discount.
Published input · Source unit: USD/month
Lifted Websites published single-location and up-to-three-location offers; custom scope is higher. Dollar denomination inferred from Arizona/US offering, not explicit USD label. Prices are offers, not national actual spending. Canadian medspa-inclusive medical SEO offer starts CAD750/month.
US medspa licensure, ownership and clinical supervision are state-specific. California's Medical Board treats medical procedures as medical practice requiring qualified personnel; verify scope and credentials before producing treatment claims or clinician titles.
Canada restricts consumer prescription-drug advertising. Health Canada specifically flags promotional Botox benefit claims, including some before/after imagery, procedure videos and testimonials. Ontario physician advertising also prohibits testimonials and has detailed imagery consent and placement conditions.
HIPAA applies to covered US entities and PHI disclosures; cookie consent alone is not marketing authorization. Apply relevant Canadian privacy requirements to sensitive health information. Review case stories, voice testimonials, pixels and episode promotion.
Health product claims require substantiation. Google treats health personalization separately from treatment/drug advertising eligibility. Build evidence review into scripts, articles, show notes, captions and ad destinations.
Clarify episode and visit fees without multiplying services already included in care. Payment model: recurring. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the clinics and health systems industry guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD/month
Illustrative small clinic chip. Chiropractic survey collections average USD450,425/year (USD37,535/month), a self-selected sample. Canada 2024 annual SME means: chiro CAD301,900, therapist/audiologist group CAD268,400. No representative combined US/Canada clinic range exists; counts and professions differ.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/attended visit
Initial-visit scenario; US Physical Therapy reports FY2025 net revenue USD105.76 across all visits. An initial assessment can reimburse differently. Payer plus patient collections, not billed charges; do not load episode revenue here and then multiply by visits.
Planning assumption · Source unit: attended visits/customer/year
One 12-visit episode within one year, not observed annual repeat frequency. Employer PT claims study median episode visits: 12 without copay versus 8 traditional, with wide variation. Chiro survey patient-visit average 34 per case is not 34 visits/year.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
One-year modeling horizon to avoid assuming repeated annual rehab after discharge. Episode definitions and discharge gaps do not establish relationship years. Longer chiropractic continuity needs practice-level evidence.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of collected revenue
Illustrative delivery-cost margin around USPH FY2025 PT segment GAAP gross margin 19.2%, not net or adjusted margin. Canada accounting gross margins: chiro 90.4%, therapist group 88.0%, with much labour indirect. A combined margin needs explicit inclusion of clinical labour and occupancy.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of qualified enquiries booked · Stage: incompatible
Scenario anchored to broad healthcare phone-lead booking benchmark, not a combined PT/chiropractic observation. Phone lead, enquiry, booked assessment and attended assessment are different events. Replace with clinic data.
Source stage does not establish this attended-meeting denominator. Enter your actual matching stage; original research is retained below.
This source measures an incompatible stage or unit. Its value is context only and is not loaded as a numeric input.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended assessments proceeding to treatment · Stage: paying-customer
Illustrative 7-in-10 progression to subsequent treatment, not an observed benchmark. No suitable combined series found. If assessment is already the paid customer event, omit this stage or use 100% to avoid double-counting.
Planning assumption · Source unit: organic CPL / paid CPL ratio
Parity scenario because no matched organic/paid PT/chiro CPL dataset found. LocaliQ PT paid-search CPL is USD32.79 and click-to-lead conversion 15.35%; these do not establish organic cost or assessment booking conversion.
Published input · Source unit: USD/month
TM Blast publishes this one-location chiropractic local SEO fee including website/Maps work and reporting. US denomination inferred from New York offering. Single vendor offer, not PT-wide mean or actual spending. Canada Create publishes chiropractic SEO from CAD1,500/month.
US physical therapists need licensing in the jurisdiction served. California chiropractic rules prohibit deceptive advertising and unlicensed practice. These examples require jurisdiction-specific review, not a uniform combined-profession checklist.
Ontario PT advertising must be truthful and verifiable, with no guaranteed outcomes or unsupported superiority; genuine testimonials require suitable consent. Standard effective May 2025.
Ontario chiropractic S-016 includes podcasts. Claims must be accurate, supported and within scope. Practice-specific testimonials are limited to the member's website with written consent and conditions; do not move those endorsements into a podcast. Current standard replaces older Advertising S-016.
Review US PHI disclosure/authorization and applicable Canadian sensitive-information consent before stories, recordings or tracking. Google health-personalization restrictions also affect paid campaigns for symptoms and conditions.
Explain matter fit and fee uncertainty without treating compensation awards as firm revenue. Payment model: one off. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Read the personal injury law guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD per month
Planning chip from 5-25 resolved fee-producing cases monthly at an assumed $5,000-$10,000 collected fee. Annualized run rate, not a US typical-firm statistic; collections are uneven.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD collected fee per acquired matter
Sensitivity band for retained fees averaged across signed matters, including zero-fee cases. Historical 2017 Nolo average payout of $52,900 is successful-claim compensation, not firm revenue or expected fees.
Planning assumption · Source unit: engagements per client per model year
One acquired client buys one complete matter. This normalization prevents repeat-case revenue being invented.
Planning assumption · Source unit: model years
One complete matter is counted once, even if it takes multiple calendar years. Not observed client tenure; do not multiply a full case fee by case duration.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of fee revenue
Assumed direct costs consume 40-60% of fees, including fair partner labor. Public PwC sample covers larger firms.
Published input · Source unit: USD per month
One vendor's live SEO/content menu; build fees and ad spend extra. Not a representative market survey.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of new enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Attended consult after screening. No credible practice-specific stage measure found; total lead conversion does not identify this stage.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended consults · Stage: paying-customer
Signed engagement after liability/damages screening. The two assumed stages imply 8-24% overall; MyCase's pooled 18% is context, not this stage.
Published input · Source unit: ratio organic CPL to paid search CPL
Derived from SEO $183 / Google Search Ads $442 per lead. Vendor study of 49 PI firms; campaigns mainly 2022-2024 despite 2026 title. Not a guaranteed future CPL.
Attorney review of claims, credentials, client examples and solicitation must follow applicable state rules. New York changed rules in June 2026.
Texas has conditional educational-media and website filing exemptions. Nonexempt ads generally require filing within 10 days after dissemination.
Florida covered ads require filing 20 days before use; websites have an exemption. July 2026 timely/late fees: $250/$750.
Contingency-fee promotional content needs expense-liability wording where required; Texas Rule 7.02(c) specifically addresses whether the client owes litigation or other expenses. Review settlement examples for unjustified expectations and privacy.
Give clear jurisdiction-specific intake guidance without implying a guaranteed outcome. Payment model: one off. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Read the criminal defense guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD per month
Planning chip: 5-20 new fee-paying matters monthly at assumed $3,000-$5,000 total fees. Not survey revenue; actual revenue recognition differs from intake deposits.
Published input · Source unit: USD fee per DUI engagement
Nolo's published private-DUI-lawyer cost range. DUI example only, not felony/trial average. Publication date unknown; search-index text available but direct fetch blocked.
Planning assumption · Source unit: engagements per client per model year
One acquired client buys one complete matter. This normalization prevents repeat-case revenue being invented.
Planning assumption · Source unit: model years
One complete matter is counted once, even if it takes multiple calendar years. Not observed client tenure; do not multiply a full case fee by case duration.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of fee revenue
Assumed direct costs consume 40-60% of fees, including fair partner labor. Public PwC sample covers larger firms.
Published input · Source unit: USD per month
One vendor's live SEO/content menu; build fees and ad spend extra. Not a representative market survey.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of new enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Urgent consumer-intake scenario with prompt response. No observed criminal-defense booking-stage benchmark found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended consults · Stage: paying-customer
Ability to pay and matter fit assumed to restrict hiring. Implies 15-35% overall, not a measured conversion rate.
Planning assumption · Source unit: ratio organic CPL to paid CPL
Transferred pooled legal-services vendor ratio: organic $580 / paid $783. Criminal-defense data unavailable; pooled paid and organic channels are not exclusively search.
Attorney review of claims, credentials, client examples and solicitation must follow applicable state rules. New York changed rules in June 2026.
Texas has conditional educational-media and website filing exemptions. Nonexempt ads generally require filing within 10 days after dissemination.
Florida covered ads require filing 20 days before use; websites have an exemption. July 2026 timely/late fees: $250/$750.
Review crime-specific pages, case narratives and audio for confidential facts, outcome promises and misleading professional claims. A general legal explainer should not imply a client relationship or a guaranteed acquittal.
Keep distinct matter types, jurisdictions and collected fee models separate. Payment model: one off. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the legal industry guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD per month
Planning chip: 8-30 fee-equivalent matters monthly at assumed $2,500-$5,000. Consumer employment, employer counsel and immigration have different economics; change to actual collected revenue.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD collected fee per acquired matter
Mixed-practice scenario. Published immigration menu and historical employment fee evidence are incompatible populations. AILA explicitly does not report typical flat fees; use actual matter mix and include no-recovery outcomes.
Planning assumption · Source unit: engagements per client per model year
One acquired client buys one complete matter. This normalization prevents repeat-case revenue being invented.
Planning assumption · Source unit: model years
One complete matter is counted once, even if it takes multiple calendar years. Not observed client tenure; do not multiply a full case fee by case duration.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of fee revenue
Assumed direct costs consume 40-60% of fees, including fair partner labor. Public PwC sample covers larger firms.
Published input · Source unit: USD per month
One vendor's live SEO/content menu; build fees and ad spend extra. Not a representative market survey.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of new enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Consumer-intake scenario after conflict, jurisdiction and eligibility screening. No credible combined-practice stage dataset found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended consults · Stage: paying-customer
Screening and affordability scenario; implies 10-27% overall. Employer retainers and plaintiff claims must be recalibrated separately.
Planning assumption · Source unit: ratio organic CPL to paid CPL
Transferred pooled legal-services vendor ratio. No employment/immigration-specific comparison found; do not describe as their measured CPL.
Attorney review of claims, credentials, client examples and solicitation must follow applicable state rules. New York changed rules in June 2026.
Texas has conditional educational-media and website filing exemptions. Nonexempt ads generally require filing within 10 days after dissemination.
Florida covered ads require filing 20 days before use; websites have an exemption. July 2026 timely/late fees: $250/$750.
Employment and immigration explainers require attorney review of current jurisdiction, eligibility, dates and procedure. Check multilingual versions and credentials under applicable advertising rules. Separate government filing fees from lawyer fees.
Make build scope, sale revenue and buyer milestones clear without implying a modular benchmark. Payment model: one off. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the construction industry guidePublished input · Source unit: USD/month
Annualized $1-$5 million band covering 38% of 2025 NAHB builder members. Annual median $3.7 million equals $308,333/month. Includes multiple builder activities; not a modular-only sample.
Published input · Source unit: USD/home sale
2024 NAHB sampled single-family home sale average, including lot. Not a national price average or modular-only contract value. Replace with the builder's recognized sale or build-contract revenue.
Planning assumption · Source unit: transactions/customer/year
One transaction in the modeled horizon. No repeat-purchase cohort supports a higher default; replace with actual customer history.
Planning assumption · Source unit: modeled revenue years
One transaction horizon, not measured relationship length. Prevents unsupported repeat revenue from inflating acquisition budgets.
Published input · Source unit: percent of company revenue
NAHB single-family-builder means in 2020 and 2023. Range of survey means, not current firm percentiles. No modular-only margin cohort found.
Published input · Source unit: percent of online-sales leads · Stage: attended-meeting
Vendor Q2 2026 homebuilder lead-to-appointment benchmark 49%. Methodology discussion defines appointments as attended, using all lead sources handled by online sales. Not modular-specific.
Published input · Source unit: percent of attended appointments · Stage: paying-customer
Vendor Q2 2026 homebuilder appointment-to-sale benchmark 22%. Sale follows an attended appointment, not just a booking. Supported online-sales programs, not every small builder; allow sales-cycle lag.
Planning assumption · Source unit: organic CPL / paid CPL
Assumed transfer of broad construction vendor ratio to builders/modular: $185 organic / $282 paid. No builder-only comparison.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/month agency fees
Planning range for project, plan and community content, anchored around a live $3,000 general SEO offer. No representative builder/modular agency-spend study found. Setup, listings, media and podcast costs separate.
California example, not a nationwide rule: contractor advertisements must carry the state license number. Verify license status, permitted trades and each operating state's disclosure requirements before publishing.
Review and testimonial content must not fabricate experience or buy sentiment-conditioned reviews. Check endorsements and client permissions before producing written or voiced proof.
Housing sales advertising, including oral statements, must not indicate preferences or discrimination based on protected characteristics. Review neighborhood descriptions, imagery, audience selection and podcast scripts.
Google housing ads in the U.S. and Canada cannot target by age, gender, parental status, marital status or ZIP code. Check campaign and landing-page classification.
Modular/factory-built homes follow local building codes; HUD-code manufactured homes are a different category. Verify the construction classification before making code, finance, placement or cost claims.
Explain expertise and transaction steps with negotiable, retained commission economics. Payment model: one off. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the construction industry guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD/month gross commission revenue
Illustrative firm with 30-120 annual transaction sides at an assumed $10,000 gross company commission per side, divided by 12. Not property sales volume or agent personal income; official firm commission figures appear inconsistent.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/company commission per closed side
Illustrative $400,000 property with separately assumed negotiated 2.5% company-side fee. Neither input is a measured norm. Commissions are negotiable; exclude the other brokerage's compensation.
Planning assumption · Source unit: transactions/customer/year
One transaction in the modeled horizon. No repeat-purchase cohort supports a higher default; replace with actual customer history.
Planning assumption · Source unit: modeled revenue years
One transaction horizon, not measured relationship length. Prevents unsupported repeat revenue from inflating acquisition budgets.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of gross commission revenue
Scenario after directly attributable agent payouts and referral fees, before overhead. No comparable small-brokerage gross-margin cohort found. If revenue is already net of agent payouts, do not deduct them twice.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of qualified new enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Scenario: 1 in 4 qualified new buyer/seller enquiries attends a consultation. No representative public brokerage cohort with this exact denominator found; internet listing clicks are not enquiries.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended consultations · Stage: paying-customer
Scenario: 3 of 10 consultations ultimately close a paid transaction side. A signed representation agreement alone is not a revenue-producing customer; include cancellation and financing fallout.
Published input · Source unit: organic CPL / paid CPL
Vendor broad real-estate benchmark: organic $450 versus paid $496 per lead. Not a brokerage-only sample.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/month agency fees
Planning range for local SEO and original market content. Historical generic local agency average $1,819 and live general offer from $3,000 are context, not measured brokerage spending. IDX, media and production separate.
Fair Housing advertising rules cover written and oral housing statements. Review listings, market guides, neighborhood descriptions, photos and podcast scripts for discriminatory preferences or exclusion.
Google housing advertising targeting restrictions apply to real-estate services as well as property listings in the U.S. and Canada.
For REALTORS, Article 12 requires a truthful advertising picture and clear firm identity. Website licensing disclosures and third-party content permissions require review. This is an association code, not every state's law.
Describe compensation as negotiable. NAR-participating buyers' agents generally require a written buyer agreement before touring, with objectively ascertainable compensation terms. Do not claim a legally required standard commission.
Review and testimonial content must not fabricate experience or buy sentiment-conditioned reviews. Check endorsements and client permissions before producing written or voiced proof.
Earn a confidential first conversation through substantiated seller education and principal review. Payment model: one off. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Read the m&a advisors and business brokers guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD/month
Scenario band: five completed engagements yearly at $40,000-$285,000 fees, divided by 12. Not a measured firm-revenue distribution.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/completed engagement
Constructed cases: $500,000 sale at assumed 8% commission; $5 million sale at published 5.7%. Deal sizes and combined band are assumptions.
Planning assumption · Source unit: engagements/customer/year
One successful transaction per acquired seller. No defensible repeat-purchase frequency found; exclude future exits and buyer cross-selling.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
One-off model normalization, not measured relationship duration. Multiply fee once; do not turn project months into recurring annual revenue.
Planning assumption · Source unit: fraction of fee revenue
Planning sensitivity after direct deal delivery and broker splits, before overhead. No comparable small-firm gross-margin survey found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: fraction of unique enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Assumes half reach an attended seller consultation after fit screening. No comparable published stage denominator found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: fraction of attended consultations · Stage: paying-customer
Illustrative completed-transaction conversion, including mandate wins and failed deals. Customer goal must mean completed fee-paying deals, not signed listings.
Planning assumption · Source unit: organic CPL / paid CPL ratio
Neutral planning ratio assumes no organic cost advantage. No directly comparable segment-specific CPL study found; never promise savings.
Published input · Source unit: USD/month
Public SEO/AEO/GEO asking range from a vendor serving this field; not evidence of typical actual client spending.
Match the firm's registration model: ordinary FINRA members use Rule 2210; capital acquisition brokers use CAB Rule 221. Balanced, substantiated claims need review.
Federal M&A broker exemption is conditional. Do not imply every business broker is SEC-registered or exempt; the old no-action letter was withdrawn.
For campaigns within Google's financial-services policy, validate local-law disclosures, fees and claimed affiliations; verification depends on target location.
Build useful investor education within the firm's actual registration and review framework. Payment model: recurring. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the wealth and financial advice industry guidePublished input · Source unit: USD/month
2025 practice-revenue IQR $235,000-$1.65 million divided by 12; advice-centric sample, not all RIAs.
Published input · Source unit: USD/customer/year
Mean annual new-client revenue across tactics. Annualized fee equivalent, not first invoice; use once yearly.
Annualized contract, fee or commission value does not establish a first payment or collected cash. Enter your actual retained payment and match its billing frequency and collection window.
This source measures an incompatible stage or unit. Its value is context only and is not loaded as a numeric input.
Planning assumption · Source unit: annual fee equivalents/customer/year
Annualized normalization. Billing monthly or quarterly must not multiply an already annual fee; replace both fields together for project planning.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
Conservative planning horizon, not observed tenure. Historical 97% annual retention cannot establish a ten-year average relationship or future survival.
Planning assumption · Source unit: fraction of advisory fee revenue
Sensitivity after direct advisory-service labor and platform costs, before overhead. EBITDA and owner take-home are not gross margin; comparable survey unavailable.
Planning assumption · Source unit: fraction of unique enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Screening scenario, not a survey. Published interview measures qualification, not attended consultations; no transferable appointment rate found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: fraction of attended consultations · Stage: paying-customer
Illustrative one-in-four outcome for mixed-channel attended meetings. Published plan-conversion denominator is insufficiently clear for this stage.
Planning assumption · Source unit: organic CPL / paid CPL ratio
Neutral assumption. Vendor financial-services CPL is broader than RIAs and organic is not isolated to search; not a transferable saving.
Published input · Source unit: USD/month
Public SEO/AEO/GEO asking range from a vendor serving wealth managers; not a survey of advisory firms' actual expenditure.
SEC Marketing Rule covers SEC-registered or required-to-register advisers. Substantiate claims, balance risks, check performance presentation and testimonial conditions, and keep advertisement records.
State-only advisers need their applicable state rules checked. FINRA Rule 2210 applies to member broker-dealer communications, including relevant dual-registered firms, not every standalone RIA.
Recorded promotional episodes and their clips need the applicable advertising review. Do not assume an edited podcast receives the SEC exclusion for extemporaneous live oral communications.
Google financial-services campaigns require visible business and fee disclosures and substantiated affiliations. Check location-specific verification before campaign planning.
Explain coverage choices while separating premiums from retained commissions. Payment model: recurring. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the wealth and financial advice industry guidePublished input · Source unit: USD/month
Two selected high-performing agency cohorts' average annual revenues, $813,367 and $1,875,302, divided by 12. Not a population percentile band.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/customer/year
Illustrative $5,000 annual premium at assumed 10% retained commission. Both inputs are assumptions; use actual account commissions and fees, never premium revenue.
Annualized contract, fee or commission value does not establish a first payment or collected cash. Enter your actual retained payment and match its billing frequency and collection window.
This source measures an incompatible stage or unit. Its value is context only and is not loaded as a numeric input.
Planning assumption · Source unit: annual commission equivalents/customer/year
Annual account normalization avoids multiplying bundled policies or semiannual renewals again. No cross-product frequency benchmark found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
Planning horizon, not measured tenure. Renewed-revenue retention includes rate effects and cannot safely convert into customer lifespan.
Planning assumption · Source unit: fraction of commission and fee revenue
Delivery-cost sensitivity including account service and producer payouts, before overhead. Published pro forma EBITDA is a different measure.
Planning assumption · Source unit: fraction of unique enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Illustrative quote-ready conversation rate after removing duplicates and unsuitable risks. No representative independent-agency stage survey found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: fraction of attended quote consultations · Stage: paying-customer
Illustrative quote-to-bound-customer rate. Carrier appetite and line of business vary; no comparable stage-defined public benchmark found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: organic CPL / paid CPL ratio
Neutral assumption. Published commercial-insurance vendor campaigns are not representative of mixed-line independent agencies or search-only organic leads.
Published input · Source unit: USD/month
Observed public asking-price span: BrightFire SEO bundle $290; Stratosphere marketing starts $799/$999. Bundled scopes differ; not an expenditure distribution.
NAIC Model 880 restricts misleading coverage, premium and insurer claims, but a model is not binding law until adopted. Verify each state's enacted rules.
Missouri example: RSMo 375.936 prohibits deceptive insurance advertising and policy misrepresentation. Coverage comparisons and scripts need policy-specific fact review.
FINRA rules are relevant when securities or variable-product communications occur through a member firm; ordinary P&C agency content is not automatically subject to FINRA.
For products within Google's financial-services policy, review destination disclosures and target-location regulations rather than assuming one national campaign approval.
Translate technical capability into useful buying answers with verified security claims. Payment model: recurring. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the b2b industry guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD/month
Selected planning chip for an established small or midsize provider, not a surveyed typical band. Assumes roughly 10 to 50 clients at an illustrative USD 10,000 monthly agreement. Replace with actual recognized revenue, including the relevant service mix.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/client/month
Midsize-buyer scenario: 50 to 100 billed users at approximately USD 100 to 150/user/month, rounded. Historical Kaseya rates supply context, not measured midsize agreement values. Its general-client average-contract MRR bins include USD 2,501 to 5,000. Exclude setup and hardware unless explicitly modeled.
Planning assumption · Source unit: monthly service periods/year
Monthly recurring service convention, not purchase-frequency research. Use 12 only with firstValue per month.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
Conservative three-year planning horizon, not observed retention. Historical survey reports varied contract terms; an agreement term is not relationship lifespan. Model one year if renewals are unproven.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of service revenue
Planning sensitivity band using fully burdened delivery labor, tools and direct subcontractor costs. No current freely accessible representative midsize-provider gross-margin range verified. Hardware resale and project work need separate margins.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of new enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Scenario: half of genuine service enquiries attend a discovery meeting. Excludes spam, job seekers and vendor solicitations. No representative published attended-meeting rate found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended consultations · Stage: paying-customer
Scenario: one new paying client per four attended qualified meetings. Not an MSP survey estimate; replace with CRM cohort results.
Published input · Source unit: ratio: organic CPL / paid CPL
Derived 418/600 from IT & Managed Services USD CPL. Vendor portfolio study, January 2022 to August 2026, per-industry sample sizes not disclosed. Organic is a channel group, not search alone; no causal savings promise.
Published input · Source unit: USD/month
Vendor guidance: entry USD 3,000 to 5,000; growth USD 5,000 to 10,000; nationwide can exceed USD 10,000. This encodes entry through growth scope, not a closed upper market bound or an independent buyer-spend survey.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/client/month
Equal-payment model convention for this billing schedule. Confirm your repeat payment has the same retained value. Midsize-buyer scenario: 50 to 100 billed users at approximately USD 100 to 150/user/month, rounded. Historical Kaseya rates supply context, not measured midsize agreement values. Its general-client average-contract MRR bins include USD 2,501 to 5,000. Exclude setup and hardware unless explicitly modeled.
Population and denominator: Midsize-buyer scenario: 50 to 100 billed users at approximately USD 100 to 150/user/month, rounded. Historical Kaseya rates supply context, not measured midsize agreement values. Its general-client average-contract MRR bins include USD 2,501 to 5,000. Exclude setup and hardware unless explicitly modeled.
Substantiate objective service, security, performance and savings claims before publication. Evidence checks and client approval add work to case studies and podcast scripts.
Google restricts third-party consumer technical support ads but expressly allows technical support supplied exclusively to businesses. Review service pages and ad destinations for an accurate B2B scope; do not assume all MSP advertising is prohibited.
Use client-approved, redacted security examples and verify certification scope before publishing compliance claims. This is a prudent editorial assumption; additional obligations depend on client contracts and the regulated vertical.
Explain technical decisions with engineer approval and confidential project boundaries. Payment model: one off. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the construction industry guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD/month of net service revenue
Selected 10 to 50 employee design-consultancy scenario: USD 186,681 median annual net revenue/employee multiplied by assumed headcount then divided by 12, rounded. Not a surveyed revenue distribution. Net revenue excludes pass-throughs; do not mix it with gross billings or construction-company turnover.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/design consultancy engagement
Illustrative fee for a scoped commercial design engagement, not the construction project's capital value. Discipline, location, project stage and procurement route vary too much for a verified general average. Require the firm's own fee data before using this in CAC.
Planning assumption · Source unit: engagement/year
Single-engagement mode to avoid presuming repeat project awards. Recurring frameworks require a different model.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
Single engagement only, not a measured customer relationship. With frequency one, this prevents inventing repeat-client lifetime revenue.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of net service revenue
Sensitivity band after direct delivery labor and direct costs, before operating overhead. No comparable representative gross-margin range verified. Deltek utilization and overhead ratios are not gross margin.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of new enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Scenario: half of genuine enquiries become attended scoping consultations. No published AEC enquiry-to-attendance cohort found.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended scoping consultations · Stage: paying-customer
Conservative scenario, not observed inbound close rate. Deltek reported 50% median proposal win rate in 2025; its 2026 commentary says win rates declined. Submitted, selected proposals are a later denominator than consultations; do not transplant the 50% rate.
Published input · Source unit: ratio: organic CPL / paid CPL
Derived 214/355 from Engineering USD CPL. Vendor study combines engineering disciplines; not civil-only or search-only. Data January 2022 to August 2026; per-industry sample sizes not disclosed.
Published input · Source unit: USD/month
Vendor's general B2B pricing block advertises USD 5,000 to 12,000/month; the engineering FAQ says USD 5,000 to 10,000/month. This preset preserves the broader displayed band and flags the inconsistency. Supplier price evidence, not typical buyer spending; confirm currency and scope before reliance.
Substantiate objective service, security, performance and savings claims before publication. Evidence checks and client approval add work to case studies and podcast scripts.
Texas is a jurisdiction example: board rules address truthful engineering assertions, false or misleading solicitation, confidentiality and unlicensed practice. Check every state served and the accuracy of licensed-firm and professional credentials. Licensed technical review adds work; the Texas compilation is not a national rule.
NSPE's professional code requires accurate qualifications, truthful public statements, proper project credit and protection of client confidences. Get project and image permission and engineer review. NSPE is a professional society, not the licensing regulator.
Answer evaluation questions without treating SQL proxies as attended demonstrations. Payment model: recurring. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the b2b industry guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD/month equivalent ARR
Selected USD 3 million to 5 million ARR cohort divided by 12, rounded. Cohort selection is an assumption, not the typical revenue range of all small and midsize SaaS firms. ARR equivalent is not necessarily recognized monthly revenue.
Published input · Source unit: USD/client/annual contract
Median ACV for private SaaS companies with USD 3 million to 5 million ARR. ACV is annualized contracted value, not necessarily first invoice or cash collected. Match annual-contract mode; do not multiply by 12.
Annualized contract, fee or commission value does not establish a first payment or collected cash. Enter your actual retained payment and match its billing frequency and collection window.
This source measures an incompatible stage or unit. Its value is context only and is not loaded as a numeric input.
Planning assumption · Source unit: annual contract periods/year
Annualized value convention aligned with ACV, not survey purchase frequency. Monthly mode must divide firstValue by 12 and use 12 periods.
Planning assumption · Source unit: years
Conservative planning horizon, not measured logo retention. SaaS Capital reports gross revenue retention, which includes contraction and cannot be inverted into customer lifespan. Renewal, expansion and discounting should be handled separately.
Published input · Source unit: percent of software revenue
2025 High Alpha survey software gross-margin interquartile range for USD 1 million to 5 million ARR firms; median 77%. Includes the selected cohort but is broader. Survey of 800+ companies, mostly US; Q2 2025 metrics. Implementation and AI inference costs can change realized margins.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of new enquiries · Stage: incompatible
Proxy scenario: vendor SEO lead-to-MQL 41% multiplied by MQL-to-SQL 51%. SQL means sales-qualified stage, not a verified attended consultation. Vendor clients generally larger than this preset; treat as assumption and replace with attended-demo data.
Source stage does not establish this attended-meeting denominator. Enter your actual matching stage; original research is retained below.
This source measures an incompatible stage or unit. Its value is context only and is not loaded as a numeric input.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended consultations · Stage: incompatible
Proxy scenario: vendor SEO SQL-to-opportunity 49% multiplied by opportunity-to-close 36%. This is an SQL-to-won proxy, not an observed demo-attendance close rate. Keep both funnel assumptions editable.
Source stage does not establish this attended-meeting denominator. Enter your actual matching stage; original research is retained below.
This source measures an incompatible stage or unit. Its value is context only and is not loaded as a numeric input.
Published input · Source unit: ratio: organic CPL / paid CPL
Derived 186/318 from B2B SaaS USD CPL. Vendor portfolio data January 2022 to August 2026. Organic includes channels beyond search and sample size is unstated. Compare on a consistent lead definition and full program costs.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/month
Chosen specialist B2B content/technical program scenario. No credible representative SaaS buyer-spend distribution found. Generic supplier surveys include cheaper small/local programs and do not establish this SaaS-specific range.
Substantiate objective service, security, performance and savings claims before publication. Evidence checks and client approval add work to case studies and podcast scripts.
Google's subscription and trial advertising rules require clear payment model and full costs. Free-trial promotion needs duration and subsequent automatic-charge disclosures. Review ads, comparison pages and conversion destinations together.
Customer endorsements must reflect real experience and material connections must be disclosed. Obtain permission and review evidence for case-study performance claims and sponsored audio.
Commercial B2B email is subject to CAN-SPAM. Review outsourced distribution templates and opt-out handling as part of content operations.
Coordinate partner expertise, end-client permissions and one accountable editorial owner. Payment model: recurring. Supplier menus and evidence describe the cited populations, rather than a representative business average.
Explore the b2b industry guidePlanning assumption · Source unit: USD/month
Selected USD 0.6 million to 3 million annual planning band, not survey percentiles. Promethean's 2025 design and marketing category means were USD 1.77 million and USD 1.96 million annually. Their sample means do not define a typical firm distribution.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/client/month
Illustrative mixed-service monthly retainer. No defensible average combining web projects, design, marketing retainers and development verified. Project-only agencies must replace this with engagement value and one-off frequency.
Planning assumption · Source unit: monthly retainer periods/year
Billing convention paired with monthly firstValue, not measured repeat purchases.
Published input · Source unit: years
Modal self-reported average-client-lifespan band: 43% of surveyed agencies selected two to five years. Vendor survey of 494 professionals, February to April 2026. Not a survival curve or population mean; validate for project versus retainer clients.
Published input · Source unit: percent of revenue
Historical arithmetic: 100% minus 55% COGS guidance in 2023 report page 16, drawing on 2022 outlook. A published industry guideline, not a 2026 observed average. Current net-profit statistics are not gross margin; overwrite with accounts.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of new enquiries · Stage: attended-meeting
Scenario: half of genuine service enquiries attend discovery. No representative agency enquiry-to-attendance study verified.
Planning assumption · Source unit: percent of attended consultations · Stage: paying-customer
Scenario: one in four attended consultations becomes a paying client. No credible representative close-rate cohort verified.
Planning assumption · Source unit: ratio: organic CPL / paid CPL
Neutral cost-parity scenario. No credible marketing/web-agency-specific organic versus paid CPL comparison found. This is not evidence of actual parity and must not drive claimed savings.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/month
External SEO-support scenario for an agency's own marketing, not white-label resale or what all agencies spend. Generic supplier survey's modal USD 500 to 1,000 quote is not agency-buyer expenditure; specialist scope can differ.
Planning assumption · Source unit: USD/client/month
Equal-payment model convention for this billing schedule. Confirm your repeat payment has the same retained value. Illustrative mixed-service monthly retainer. No defensible average combining web projects, design, marketing retainers and development verified. Project-only agencies must replace this with engagement value and one-off frequency.
Population and denominator: Illustrative mixed-service monthly retainer. No defensible average combining web projects, design, marketing retainers and development verified. Project-only agencies must replace this with engagement value and one-off frequency.
Substantiate objective service, security, performance and savings claims before publication. Evidence checks and client approval add work to case studies and podcast scripts.
Agencies can be responsible for deceptive endorsements and undisclosed material connections. Verify testimonial permission, client outcomes and sponsorship disclosure in text and audio.
CAN-SPAM applies to commercial B2B email and can involve both the promoted business and service provider. Distribution operations need accurate message identification and functioning opt-out processes.
No general licensing-board content review applies to ordinary agency services in the sources reviewed. Client work in regulated sectors needs that sector's own review rules; this is a scope limitation, not a blanket legal exemption.